Skip to main content

Security report for innoq.com

INNOQ · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INNOQ is a professional technology consulting firm specializing in software architecture, digital product development, AI, and training services. The company operates primarily in Germany and Switzerland with multiple office locations, serving technology-focused clients seeking innovative and pragmatic software solutions. Their market position is that of an established medium-sized consultancy with a strong emphasis on future-proofing technology and delivering effective digital infrastructures. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern web technologies, including optimized performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility features. The use of Cloudflare for hosting and analytics, Cloudinary for media delivery, and FriendlyCaptcha for form protection indicates a well-architected and secure technical environment. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CAPTCHA to prevent spam, and offers S/MIME certificates for encrypted email communication, reflecting a strong security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program suggests areas for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional presentation and contact information. Overall, INNOQ presents a low-risk profile with a solid business and technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms to further improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innoq.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention innoq.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
33%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for innoq.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INNOQ holds a competitive position in the technology consulting sector, leveraging expertise in software architecture, AI, and digital transformation. Their business model focuses on consulting, product development, and knowledge transfer, targeting enterprises and technology professionals. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting contracts, training sessions, and digital product engagements. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with dedicated subdomains and external platforms for specialized services and events. Growth indicators include active content publishing, podcasts, and event participation. The company’s multi-location presence in Germany and Switzerland supports regional market penetration and client accessibility.

Security posture

INNOQ demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, CAPTCHA integration, and encrypted email options via S/MIME certificates. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses modern security practices for form protection. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in transparency and formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. GDPR compliance is evident through a comprehensive privacy policy and data processing disclosures. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could be improved to enhance security culture and client trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
  5. Maintain and regularly update WHOIS information to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
innoQ Deutschland GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INNOQ
Description
INNOQ is a technology consulting firm. We deliver effective software applications, digital infrastructures, pragmatic software architecture, and trainings.
Key services
Strategy and Technology Consulting, Digital Product Development, Software Architecture and Development, Digital Platforms and Infrastructure, Knowledge Transfer, Coaching and Trainings, Data & AI, Legacy Modernization, Software Reviews
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Cloudinary (image hosting), FriendlyCaptcha, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
No common CMS detected
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of FriendlyCaptcha for form spam protection
  • S/MIME certificates provided for encrypted email communication
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and comprehensive content focused on technology consulting.
  3. Multiple contact methods including secure email options and contact form with CAPTCHA.
  4. Strong branding and consistent design.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie banner visible, but privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces transparency but does not negate trust given website quality.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web standards including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with custom frontend components and optimized asset loading strategies such as font preloading and image hosting via Cloudinary. Hosting and analytics are managed through Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and structured content. The use of FriendlyCaptcha enhances form security. No CMS or common frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or bespoke solution. Performance is fast with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. Technical risks are minimal but could be mitigated further by adding security headers and formalizing privacy and security disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innoq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innoq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.