Skip to main content

Security report for innlandetfylke.no

Innlandet fylkeskommune · Government · Norway

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Innlandet fylkeskommune operates as the regional government authority for Innlandet county in Norway, providing public administration and services related to education, transport, culture, and regional development. The website serves as an official portal for residents and stakeholders, offering information and resources in Norwegian. The domain registration aligns with the entity's founding year, supporting legitimacy and trust. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript modules and React components, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. The inclusion of Siteimprove Analytics suggests attention to performance and accessibility, although explicit CMS or hosting details are not evident. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of explicit contact information and incident response channels further limits transparency. Overall, the website is professionally designed and trustworthy as a government portal but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innlandetfylke.no

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Innlandet fylkeskommune holds a key position as a regional government entity in Norway, focusing on public service delivery and regional governance. Its business model is non-commercial, centered on administrative and service functions for the county's population. The website targets local residents, businesses, and public sector stakeholders. The entity's market position is stable as a government authority, with no direct competitors in its domain. The lack of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries is consistent with its governmental nature. The website's content and structure reflect a focus on transparency and public engagement, although the absence of detailed contact and policy information suggests room for improved stakeholder communication.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic, with HTTPS presumably enabled (inferred from the URL) but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks is positive but requires ongoing maintenance to avoid vulnerabilities. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance risks under GDPR. No forms or input fields with security controls were identified, limiting the attack surface but also reducing user interaction capabilities. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Innlandet fylkeskommune
Description
Innlandet fylkeskommune is a regional government authority in Norway, responsible for public services and administration in the Innlandet county. The website provides information about regional governance, services, news, and public resources.
Key services
Public administration, Regional development, Education and culture, Transport and infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES6 modules, Siteimprove Analytics, Custom CSS variables, ReactJS (shared components), Vanilla JS
Frameworks
ReactJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Siteimprove Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Siteimprove Analytics
Marketing tools
Siteimprove Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Norwegian regional government portal.
  2. Content is in Norwegian language.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript modules and React components.
  6. Includes Siteimprove Analytics for performance and accessibility monitoring.
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  8. No forms with identifiable fields for contact or data collection detected in the truncated HTML.
  9. No social media links or external company contact information found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including ES6 JavaScript modules and ReactJS components, indicating a contemporary and modular architecture. The presence of Siteimprove Analytics suggests active monitoring of performance and accessibility. However, the CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified, which may indicate a custom or proprietary solution. The CSS uses variables and responsive design techniques, supporting good mobile optimization. Performance appears moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The absence of visible security headers and limited metadata reduces technical robustness. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO metadata, implement security best practices, and improve transparency through published policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innlandetfylke.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innlandetfylke.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.