Skip to main content

Security report for inmotionrobotic.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at www.inmotionrobotic.com appears to be either inaccessible, blocked, or under construction. The WHOIS data query returned no registration information, indicating the domain may not be registered or WHOIS data is restricted. The website content is minimal, consisting primarily of Wix platform boilerplate code without substantive business information, contact details, or policies. This limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or credibility. Technically, the site uses Wix CMS and includes some polyfills and core-js libraries, but lacks security headers, privacy policies, or analytics integrations. The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation and absence of security best practices. Overall, the site presents a high risk of being non-legitimate or inactive, and lacks essential compliance and trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inmotionrobotic.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of meaningful content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of company legal name, registration, contact information, or market positioning. The site appears to be a placeholder or inactive, with no visible partnerships or certifications. No revenue model or target audience can be identified.

Security posture

The security posture is poor. The lack of WHOIS data, absence of security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement suggest significant vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are present. The site does not demonstrate GDPR compliance or data protection measures. No forms or data collection mechanisms were found, reducing attack surface but also indicating lack of business activity. The site is likely not maintained or monitored for security.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and public if appropriate.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and configure security headers to protect users.
  4. Add clear business contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical address to improve credibility.
  5. Regularly update website content and technical components to improve user experience and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS query returned 'No match for "WWW.INMOTIONROBOTIC.COM"' indicating domain may not be registered or WHOIS data is blocked. The HTML content is minimal and mostly Wix platform boilerplate without actual business content, suggesting the site is inaccessible or blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Wix, core-js, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix.com Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered
  2. Website content is minimal and mostly Wix platform default code
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details present
  5. No security headers or SSL information available
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  7. Site likely inaccessible or blocked
  8. No social media or external business links found
  9. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, using standard Wix scripts and polyfills such as core-js and focus-within-polyfill. The site lacks custom frameworks or advanced technologies. Performance is moderate due to Wix hosting. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO optimization is poor with missing meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. No analytics or marketing tools are integrated. The site appears to be a default or underdeveloped Wix site with no customizations or business-specific technical implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inmotionrobotic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inmotionrobotic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.