Skip to main content

Security report for inmicsnebula.fi

Telia Company · Telecommunications · Finland

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Telia Company operates the inmicsnebula.fi website as a leading telecommunications and ICT service provider in Finland, targeting business customers with a broad portfolio of connectivity, devices, IT, security, cloud, and IoT services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, consistent branding, and a comprehensive service offering. Technically, the site uses Magnolia CMS, integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Datadog RUM, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely, and employs strong security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the SSL configuration lacks support for modern TLS protocols, which is a notable security gap. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are exposed; contact is primarily via web forms. Privacy and cookie policies are well documented and GDPR compliant.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inmicsnebula.fi

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
86
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Telia Company holds a strong market position in Finland's telecommunications sector, offering a wide range of business services including mobile subscriptions, devices, IT and security services, cloud and AI solutions, and IoT. The business model focuses on integrated ICT solutions for enterprises, supported by a partner ecosystem including e-commerce and service portals. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics extensively to engage its target audience. The website's content and navigation are designed to support business customers effectively, indicating a strategic focus on customer experience and service breadth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with implementation of key HTTP security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and a restrictive Content-Security-Policy. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting privacy compliance. However, the SSL configuration is outdated, lacking support for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, which exposes the site to potential cryptographic weaknesses. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, representing additional areas for improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade SSL/TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to enhance encryption security.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to strengthen domain and certificate security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Continue maintaining and enhancing privacy compliance and cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magnolia CMS and hosted by Telia/Sonera infrastructure, indicating a robust enterprise-grade platform. It integrates modern JavaScript libraries and services including jQuery, Datadog RUM for real user monitoring and session replay, Google Tag Manager for tag management, Optimizely for experimentation, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Performance is fast with mobile optimization and accessibility rated good to excellent. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive metadata and Open Graph tags. The site uses multiple external domains for partner services and e-commerce, reflecting a complex but well-integrated digital ecosystem. Technical debt is minimal, but SSL/TLS configuration requires modernization to mitigate cryptographic risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inmicsnebula.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inmicsnebula.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.