Skip to main content

Security report for ingraphics.com.br

Ingraphics Soluções & Imagens · Technology · Brazil

Partial score · DNS & email only

31/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ingraphics Soluções & Imagens is a small digital marketing agency based in the ABC region of São Paulo, Brazil. The company offers a range of services including digital marketing, web design, graphic design, illustration, and campaign management. Their website demonstrates a professional approach with clear service offerings and client testimonials, targeting businesses seeking to improve their digital presence and marketing effectiveness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and integrates marketing tools such as ActiveCampaign and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security gap that undermines user trust and data protection. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are present but basic, with no explicit GDPR compliance or incident response information. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ingraphics.com.br

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency positions itself as a regional player focused on personalized digital marketing solutions. Their business model revolves around service delivery in marketing and creative design, supported by client testimonials and social media engagement. The presence of client project links suggests active client relationships and a portfolio-driven marketing approach. The company leverages popular CMS and marketing automation tools to streamline operations. Growth potential exists through enhanced security posture and expanded compliance measures. Partnerships with client domains indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business targets small to medium enterprises in the São Paulo region, emphasizing consultative and results-driven services.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and email domain protection via DMARC is absent. While no immediate vulnerabilities like subdomain takeover or known SSL exploits are detected, the missing encryption is a critical flaw. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack comprehensive GDPR compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The site uses standard security practices in DNS SPF records but needs significant improvements in transport layer security and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Add DMARC, DKIM, and SPF records to improve email domain security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data subject rights.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program.
  6. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  7. Optimize website performance by enabling caching and minimizing resource load times.
  8. Improve accessibility features and conduct regular audits to ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ingraphics Soluções & Imagens
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder and uses several plugins including Yoast SEO, ActiveCampaign subscription forms, and Essential Addons for Elementor. It loads external resources from Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and jQuery libraries. Hosting is provided by HostGator with DNS servers ns1026 and ns1027.hostgator.com.br. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS versions, which is a major technical deficiency. Performance metrics are missing, but the page is likely slow due to lack of caching and optimization. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ingraphics.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ingraphics.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.