Skip to main content

Security report for ingenico.com

Ingenico Group · Technology

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website exhibits a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-level issues detected. SSL/TLS and network security modules are fully compliant, scoring 100%, indicating robust encryption and network defenses. However, medium-level concerns exist primarily around missing or misconfigured security headers, lack of DNSSEC implementation, and failures in GDPR and NIS2 compliance assessments. These gaps could expose the business to data protection regulatory risks and potential DNS-related attacks. Low-level issues such as a complex SPF record are noted but pose minimal immediate threat. Addressing these medium-level issues will enhance regulatory compliance, improve data protection, and reduce attack surface exposure. Overall, the site is secure but requires targeted improvements to mitigate compliance and configuration risks.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ingenico.com. View the latest report
3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching ingenico.com

This scan found 3 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
95
DNS health
90
Network security
100
Average
96
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ingenico.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,522
Employees
307
Customers
2,463
Third parties
752
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 194 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ingenico.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –hipchat.techno.ingenico.com2026-06-17
  • –afs.ingenico.com2026-06-13
  • –afs.ingenico.com2026-06-08
  • –afs.ingenico.com2026-06-08
  • –afs.ingenico.com2026-06-08

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Technical notes

Notes

The absence or misconfiguration of security headers leaves the website vulnerable to client-side attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) and clickjacking. Failure to enable DNSSEC allows attackers to perform DNS cache poisoning or spoofing, potentially redirecting users to malicious sites. GDPR and NIS2 assessment failures indicate insufficient controls around personal data handling and cybersecurity governance, exposing the organization to regulatory fines and reputational damage. The SPF record complexity, while a low-level issue, could impact email deliverability and security. The perfect scores in SSL/TLS and network security confirm strong encryption and network defense mechanisms are in place, mitigating risks of data interception and network attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ingenico.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ingenico.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.