Skip to main content

Security report for infusionsoft.app

Keap · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Keap, formerly known as Infusionsoft, operates a business automation platform targeting small to medium businesses seeking to streamline their sales and marketing processes. The analyzed login page is professionally designed, featuring secure authentication mechanisms including multi-factor authentication and third-party login options such as Google and Okta. The platform leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Wistia for video content, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure form validation, though some improvements such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could enhance compliance and protection. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for a well-established SaaS business automation provider.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of infusionsoft.app. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infusionsoft.app

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Keap positions itself as a key player in the business automation and CRM market, offering SaaS solutions that integrate sales, marketing, and operational workflows. Its business model relies on subscription services with a focus on small and medium enterprises. The presence of a free trial domain (try.keap.com) indicates a growth strategy centered on customer acquisition through hands-on experience. The company maintains consistent branding and trust signals, though direct contact information is not exposed on the login page, likely to funnel users through support channels post-login. The ecosystem includes integrations with major identity providers, enhancing user convenience and security.

Security posture

The security maturity level is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure login forms that include validation and multi-factor authentication support. The use of third-party authentication providers like Google and Okta further strengthens access control. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the presence of a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing on this page. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden security posture.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Include accessible contact information or support links on the login page to assist users effectively.
  5. Regularly audit third-party libraries and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Keap
Description
Keap provides business automation software focused on streamlining operations and boosting sales through automation strategies.
Key services
business automation, CRM, sales and marketing automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap 3.2.0, Font Awesome 4.3.0, Lodash 4.17.21, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Wistia video player
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with validation
  • Multi-factor authentication support indicated
  • Third-party login integrations (Google, Okta)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Wistia
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Wistia
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Keap (formerly Infusionsoft) business automation software.
  2. No WHOIS data for the subdomain, which is expected.
  3. Secure login form with multi-factor authentication support.
  4. External links primarily to trusted domains related to Keap and its services.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on this login page.
  6. Privacy policy is linked and appears comprehensive.
  7. No cookie consent banner detected on this page.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a stable and widely adopted technology stack including jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap 3.2.0, Font Awesome, and Lodash. The inclusion of Google Fonts and Wistia for video content indicates attention to user experience and branding. The page is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no significant delays or errors observed. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Accessibility features are basic but present, with form validation and focus management. SEO optimization is basic, with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infusionsoft.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infusionsoft.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.