Skip to main content

Security report for infront.net.au

Infront · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infront is an Australian-based technology company specializing in hybrid cloud solutions, managed services, and professional advisory services. Positioned as a leader in hybrid cloud IT, Infront serves government agencies and SMEs with a comprehensive portfolio including cloud architecture, migration, disaster recovery, and modern workplace solutions. Their strategic partnerships with Microsoft, Dell, Nutanix, and others reinforce their market credibility and technical expertise. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to IT decision makers and organizations seeking hybrid cloud adoption. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, ensuring a responsive and SEO-optimized experience. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics indicates moderate user tracking, though no cookie consent mechanism is present. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Infront demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business objectives. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security policy transparency, and incident response readiness would enhance trust and regulatory adherence. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and consistent ownership.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infront.net.au

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infront.net.au, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for infront.net.au right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infront operates as a managed services provider and systems integrator focused on hybrid cloud IT solutions. Their business model centers on delivering turnkey managed, advisory, and professional services to government and SME sectors. The company leverages strong partnerships with major technology vendors to differentiate its offerings. Revenue streams likely include managed service subscriptions, professional consulting fees, and cloud solution deployments. The target customer segments are government agencies requiring secure virtual data centers and SMEs needing simplified IT collaboration solutions. The presence of customer testimonials and case studies indicates a focus on customer success and market credibility. The partnership ecosystem with Microsoft, Dell, Nutanix, and Buttonwood enhances competitive advantage and market reach. Growth indicators include active content marketing, video resources, and a clear cloud adoption framework.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, limiting transparency on how security incidents are handled. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy reduces the ability for external parties to report security issues responsibly. Forms are implemented via Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no explicit anti-spam or input validation details are visible. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting best practices and increasing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Infront
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infront
Description
Infront is a leading partner of hybrid cloud solutions, including on-premises and cloud. They provide managed services, advisory, and professional services focused on hybrid cloud IT for modern organizations.
Key services
Hybrid Cloud Solutions, Managed Services (Storage, Backup, Disaster Recovery, Cloud Operations, Desktop as a Service), Professional Services (Cloud Architecture, Migration, ICT Strategy), Advisory Services (Strategy Development, Data and Security)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, KingComposer page builder, Essential Addons for Elementor, Circle Progress Bar plugin, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL uses https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. Content is focused on hybrid cloud solutions and managed IT services.
  3. Strong presence of partner logos and customer testimonials enhances trust.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and theme indicates up-to-date technology stack.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.2 using the Astra theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, KingComposer, and Essential Addons for Elementor. The tech stack supports responsive design, SEO optimization, and interactive content such as carousels and video embeds. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking user behavior. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and font providers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business information, enhancing search engine visibility. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infront.net.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infront.net.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.