Skip to main content

Security report for infotec.lt

UAB INFO-TEC · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB INFO-TEC is a Lithuanian IT services company specializing in document digitization, electronic document management, IT maintenance, and printing equipment rental. The company serves a diverse client base including family businesses, corporations, and public institutions, positioning itself as a reliable and experienced service provider in the Lithuanian market. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with AngularJS and jQuery, integrating modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Swiper.js for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data implemented for better search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the website's professional presentation and business details support legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital presence with good content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would enhance the security posture and user trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infotec.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INFO-TEC operates in the technology sector focusing on IT and document management services. Their business model centers on providing tailored solutions including document scanning, electronic archiving, IT support, and printing equipment leasing. The company targets Lithuanian enterprises and institutions requiring efficient document and IT management. Their market position is strengthened by long-term client relationships and a broad service portfolio. The website showcases a strong partnership ecosystem through client logos and uses multilingual support to reach wider audiences. Growth indicators include a stable team size and numerous completed projects. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts, equipment rental, and consumables sales. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and SEO optimization, supporting competitive advantage in the local market.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent aligns with GDPR requirements, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security or incident response policies are available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were observed in the site content. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced header configurations, published security policies, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to improve resilience and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB INFO-TEC
Description
UAB „INFO-TEC” paslaugų centras yra informacinių technologijų srityje dirbanti, sparčiai besiplečianti organizacija, teikianti dokumentų skenavimo, skaitmeninimo, elektroninių dokumentų saugojimo, IT priežiūros, spausdinimo įrangos pardavimo ir nuomos paslaugas.
Key services
Dokumentų skaitmeninimas, IT priežiūra, Spausdinimo įrangos nuoma, Elektroninių dokumentų archyvavimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO plugin, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin)
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Lithuanian with English alternate language.
  3. Strong focus on document digitization, IT maintenance, and printing services.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact form is primary contact method.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or dates extracted.
  9. No suspicious external domains or links detected.
  10. Advertising and analytics use industry standard tools with transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a WordPress CMS enhanced with AngularJS and jQuery frameworks, providing dynamic content and interactive features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for improved search engine indexing. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for traffic analysis and marketing optimization. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and APIs, including Google Fonts and Maps. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script optimization and caching. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. Accessibility is basic, suggesting opportunities for enhancement. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated frameworks and security hardening to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infotec.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infotec.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.