Skip to main content

Security report for informio.at

INFORMIO Software GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INFORMIO Software GmbH is a small Austrian technology company specializing in ERP business software solutions, including Microsoft Dynamics ERP, Informio BELVEDERE, and B2B portals. The company positions itself as a certified business partner offering consulting, project management, and implementation services primarily targeting medium and large enterprises as well as SMEs. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and contact information. Technically, the website is built on Microsoft IIS with ASP.NET and uses modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery. However, the site lacks HTTPS encryption, which is a critical security shortfall. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, and privacy policy is present but basic. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, supporting marketing and engagement efforts. Overall, the digital maturity is moderate but requires urgent security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching informio.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on ERP and cloud solutions, leveraging partnerships with Microsoft products like Dynamics, Office 365, and Azure. Their business model centers on providing tailored software solutions and consulting services to optimize business processes. The firm emphasizes team collaboration and long-term project lifecycle support, indicating a consultative and service-oriented approach. Market positioning is strengthened by certification and international project experience. The company targets businesses seeking ERP modernization and cloud migration, with a portfolio that includes both software products and implementation services. Growth potential is supported by integration with Microsoft cloud ecosystems and a clear focus on customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security posture due to the absence of HTTPS and SSL certificates, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No advanced security headers or policies are implemented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. While SPF records for email are correctly configured, the lack of encryption and security best practices significantly undermines trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and other data protection regulations. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator but insufficient alone. The company should prioritize securing the website with TLS, implementing security headers, and publishing security policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and data subject rights.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to demonstrate commitment to security and incident response readiness.
  5. Improve website performance metrics and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INFORMIO Software GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Microsoft IIS 10.0 with ASP.NET technology, managed via Plesk on a Windows server environment. Frontend technologies include Bootstrap, jQuery, and Revolution Slider, with Google Fonts and Google Maps API integration. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical deficiency. DNS records are properly configured with valid SPF for email protection. Performance data is missing, but inferred slow loading may be due to lack of optimization or server configuration. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or semi-custom solution. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include outdated server software exposure and missing encryption, which could impact business operations and customer trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with informio.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review informio.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.