Skip to main content

Security report for infonia.cz

Infonia spol. s r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infonia spol. s r.o. is a Czech digital agency specializing in custom web design, SEO, PPC campaigns, and digital marketing services. With over 25 years of experience and more than 500 satisfied clients, the company positions itself as a reliable partner for businesses seeking to enhance their online presence. Their offerings include proprietary CMS-based websites, graphic design, copywriting, and ongoing technical support. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and client testimonials, reinforcing trust and credibility. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook. The site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. The security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification, reducing overall trustworthiness. The website content is safe, business-oriented, and compliant with basic privacy practices. Overall, Infonia demonstrates a mature digital presence with solid business credibility but should enhance transparency around privacy policies and security configurations. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infonia.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infonia.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for infonia.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate infonia.cz and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
5
Registered
5
Resolving
5
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • in•••••.czMediumhomoglyph
  • in••••.czMediumomission
  • in•••••.czLowreplacement

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of infonia.cz with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infonia operates in the technology sector as a medium-sized digital agency focused on web development and online marketing services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing market presence, proprietary CMS solutions, and a broad portfolio of over 1800 websites created. The company targets businesses and organizations in need of tailored digital solutions, emphasizing quality, innovation, and customer satisfaction. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web development, ongoing marketing campaigns, and support services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by client testimonials and certifications. Growth indicators include a robust blog with recent content and active marketing campaigns. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining high service quality and expanding digital marketing offerings to stay competitive.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The use of CAPTCHA scripts indicates attention to form security, although no forms were detected in the provided content. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies publicly available. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by the cookie consent banner but lacks detailed privacy policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a digital agency website but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to enhance trust and legitimacy.
  5. Develop and communicate an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to strengthen security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Infonia spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infonia spol. s r.o.
Description
Děláme moderní a mobilní webové stránky na vlastním redakčním systému. SEO a PPC kampaně na Google, Seznamu i Facebooku.
Key services
Web design and development, SEO, PPC campaigns, Copywriting, Graphic design, Marketing, Technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Smartsupp Chat, Smartlook, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, PPC campaign tools
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting clients needing web design and marketing services.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Website uses modern tracking and marketing technologies responsibly.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  8. Security headers are not explicitly detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. Website content is in Czech language.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary CMS platform with a technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and various marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and asynchronous analytics. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design meta tags and CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infonia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infonia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.