Skip to main content

Security report for infolex.lt

UAB Verslo žinios · Government · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INFOLEX.LT is a well-established Lithuanian legal portal operated by UAB Verslo žinios, providing comprehensive legal news, legislation databases, court practice information, legal discussions, and events. The portal targets legal professionals, including lawyers, judges, notaries, and law students, offering subscription-based legal updates and calculators. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, integrates Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook SDK for analytics and social media engagement. Advertising is managed through Smart AdServer and other networks, with appropriate cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though some security headers like CSP are not explicitly detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site is accessible, functional, and trustworthy for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infolex.lt

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INFOLEX operates in the government and media sectors, focusing on legal information services in Lithuania. Its business model revolves around providing subscription-based access to legal databases, news, and professional legal content. The portal benefits from its association with UAB Verslo žinios, a recognized media company. The target market includes legal professionals and institutions requiring up-to-date legal information and analysis. The portal's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive legal content, regular updates, and integration of legal tools such as calculators and podcasts. Partnerships with advertising networks and analytics providers support monetization and user engagement. The presence of social media and subscription options indicates a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security best practices such as Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is implemented to comply with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit Content-Security-Policy headers and security.txt files indicates room for improvement in security transparency and defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information, which could be enhanced to improve trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional headers and formalized security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy headers to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising integrations for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Provide explicit security and incident response policies to increase user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Verslo žinios
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Verslo žinios
Description
INFOLEX is a Lithuanian legal portal providing legal news, court practice, legislation, legal discussions, events, and legal services. It targets legal professionals and those interested in Lithuanian law.
Key services
Legal news and analysis, Legislation database, Court practice information, Legal discussions and forums, Legal event announcements, Legal calculators, Subscription-based legal updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Microsoft Azure (podcast hosting), Smart AdServer, Facebook SDK, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Smart AdServer, Google AdSense, Tradedoubler
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive Lithuanian legal portal with rich content and services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; WHOIS analysis incomplete.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern tracking and advertising technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found.
  6. Site includes login forms and subscription forms with email collection.
  7. Social media presence primarily on Facebook.
  8. Advertising is integrated via multiple ad networks and tracking pixels.
  9. Site content is in Lithuanian with some English language options.
  10. Site includes podcasts and legal news articles updated regularly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with Windows-1257 charset, jQuery, and multiple third-party scripts including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook SDK, and Smart AdServer for advertising. The podcast player is custom-built and hosted on Microsoft Azure. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with some legacy code (IE9 compatibility meta tag) and multiple asynchronous scripts. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags. Accessibility and mobile optimization are basic but functional. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from modernization and performance optimization to improve loading speed and mobile experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infolex.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infolex.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.