Skip to main content

Security report for infogram.com

Infogram · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infogram is a well-established SaaS company specializing in AI-powered data visualization tools, including infographics, charts, dashboards, and maps. The platform targets a broad audience including businesses, marketers, educators, government, and nonprofits, offering a subscription-based model with team collaboration and API access. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, multi-language support, and professional branding. Technically, Infogram leverages modern web technologies such as React, integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar, and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring performance and scalability. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and holds SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, reflecting a strong commitment to data protection and operational security. Privacy compliance is supported by clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, with no critical security or content safety issues detected.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of infogram.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infogram.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infogram.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,583
Employees
1
Customers
9,535
Third parties
47
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-06-09 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for infogram.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –infogram.com2026-06-09

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infogram holds a solid market position in the data visualization SaaS sector, leveraging AI to differentiate its offerings. Its business model focuses on subscription plans catering to individuals, teams, and enterprises, with additional revenue streams from API usage and premium features. The company targets diverse sectors including media, marketing, education, government, and nonprofits, indicating a broad customer base. The presence of customer success stories, webinars, and detailed feature sets suggests active engagement and a focus on customer education. The domain's long history and consistent registration data reinforce business credibility. The ecosystem includes integrations with popular platforms and tools, enhancing its competitive advantage. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified in the provided data.

Security posture

Infogram exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, indicating adherence to recognized security frameworks. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap but does not critically impact security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The site uses cookie consent tools aligned with GDPR requirements, though explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly evident. Overall, the security culture appears robust, with room for improvement in transparency around incident response and vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infogram
Description
Infogram is an easy-to-use, AI-powered tool for creating stunning infographics, charts, dashboards, maps, and more. Effortlessly design and share interactive data visualizations across various platforms.
Key services
Infographic creation, Chart and graph generation, Dashboards, Maps, Team collaboration, API access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Hotjar, OneTrust (cookie consent), Zendesk (support chat), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong use of AI-powered tools for data visualization.
  3. Comprehensive navigation with multiple language support.
  4. Good integration of analytics and marketing tools.
  5. Security posture is strong with SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and HTTPS.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework, utilizing asynchronous JavaScript loading and integration with multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Zendesk for analytics and support. Hosting is managed via AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliability and scalability. The site is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with responsive design and accessibility features evident. SEO is supported through comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured navigation. Performance indicators suggest fast loading times and efficient resource management. Technical debt appears minimal, with opportunities to enhance DNS security and formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 88/100Low16 findingsView report
  2. 88/100Low16 findingsView report
  3. 88/100Low16 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infogram.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infogram.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.