Skip to main content

Security report for infinigate.co.uk

Infinigate UK & Ireland Ltd · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infinigate UK & Ireland Ltd operates as a prominent IT distributor specializing in cybersecurity, secure networks, and cloud solutions. The company enables its partners to grow by collaborating with renowned vendors, positioning itself as a key player in the UK technology distribution market. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting IT resellers and partners in the cybersecurity and cloud sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Yoast SEO Premium, Matomo Analytics, and Cookiebot for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, employs bot detection mechanisms, and manages cookie consent effectively, though explicit security headers could be further enhanced. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the professional branding and consistent content mitigate this concern. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, auditing third-party scripts regularly, and ensuring robust form security to maintain and improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infinigate.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infinigate's market positioning as a specialized IT distributor in cybersecurity and cloud solutions provides it with competitive advantages in a growing sector. The business model focuses on partner enablement and distribution, leveraging relationships with major vendors and a broad partner ecosystem. The website's content and social media integration suggest active engagement with its target audience of IT resellers and partners. While direct revenue streams are not disclosed, the distribution and enablement services imply B2B transactional operations. Growth indicators include a comprehensive digital presence and use of advanced analytics and consent tools. The company is a subsidiary of Nuvias, indicating backing by a larger parent organization. No subsidiaries or related domains were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, including bot detection via Cloudflare Turnstile cookies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, some standard security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not explicitly found and should be verified or implemented. Compliance with GDPR is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie management. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, suggesting areas for improvement in security culture and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify standard security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Establish and publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including security and incident response contacts, to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Develop long-term security strategies focusing on continuous monitoring, incident response readiness, and compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infinigate UK & Ireland Ltd
Description
IT distributor for cybersecurity, secure networks & cloud – enabling our partners to grow with renowned vendors.
Key services
Cybersecurity product distribution, Cloud solutions distribution, Partner enablement and support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Cookiebot Consent Management, Cloudflare (implied by cookies and scripts)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • Use of bot detection cookies (Cloudflare Turnstile)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Microsoft Application Insights, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Azure
Tracking pixels
Matomo, Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, LinkedIn Insights, Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. Social media presence is well integrated
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No visible forms in the provided HTML snippet
  7. Use of modern analytics and consent management tools
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but not critical given other trust signals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization and Matomo Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. Cookiebot is employed for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The presence of jQuery and various CSS and JS assets indicates a modern but standard web technology stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicit, but Cloudflare services are implied through cookies and scripts. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for further optimization in security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infinigate.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infinigate.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.