Skip to main content

Security report for infineon.com

Infineon Technologies AG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infineon Technologies AG is a global leader in semiconductor and system solutions, specializing in automotive, industrial, and energy-efficient technologies. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product and application information, targeting B2B customers in technology-driven sectors. The company offers extensive design support, community engagement, and partner ecosystems to enhance customer experience and innovation. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Web Components, polyfills for legacy browser support, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Qualtrics. The site is mobile optimized and features good accessibility and SEO practices, although performance metrics were not available. From a security perspective, while the site implements several security headers and a Content Security Policy in report-only mode, it critically lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not properly enable HTTPS, posing a significant risk to user data and trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and business representation but requires urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to meet modern security standards and protect its users effectively.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of infineon.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infineon.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention infineon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,250
Employees
73
Customers
8,711
Third parties
466
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-14 · 114 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for infineon.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sso.infineon.com2026-06-14
  • –sso.infineon.com2026-06-10
  • –sso.infineon.com2026-06-10
  • –sso.infineon.com2026-06-01
  • –sso.infineon.com2026-05-29

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infineon holds a strong market position as a semiconductor manufacturer with a focus on automotive, industrial, and energy sectors. Their business model is primarily B2B, providing semiconductor products, design tools, and support services. The company leverages a broad partner ecosystem and community platforms to foster innovation and customer engagement. Their extensive product portfolio and certifications like ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 reinforce their credibility. The website content and structure indicate a large enterprise with global reach and a focus on technology leadership and sustainability. Strategically, Infineon benefits from partnerships with legacy Cypress platforms and community engagement through platforms like Hackster.io. Their marketing and analytics infrastructure is robust, supporting extensive user tracking and data-driven decision-making while maintaining GDPR compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture shows a mixed maturity level. Positive aspects include the use of multiple security headers (X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy), a Content Security Policy (though only in report-only mode), and a strict transport security header present but not enabled due to lack of HTTPS. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and disabled HTTPS protocols represent a critical vulnerability that undermines all other security measures. This exposes users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and data interception. No known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the analysis. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site requires immediate SSL/TLS remediation and enforcement of security policies to elevate its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Move Content Security Policy from report-only to enforce mode to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to strengthen transport security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  5. Enhance incident response contact channels with dedicated security email addresses (e.g., security@infineon.com).

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Infineon Technologies AG
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with modern front-end technologies including Web Components and ES6 polyfills for compatibility. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and user experience enhancement such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Qualtrics, and Eloqua. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with clear navigation and structured content. Performance data was not available, but the site uses caching headers and optimized resource loading. The lack of SSL/TLS is a major technical risk. Hosting details are minimal but indicate a dedicated web frontend server. The site could benefit from performance monitoring and further optimization to improve load times and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
  2. 83/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infineon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infineon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.