Skip to main content

Security report for inext.cz

INTERNEXT 2000, s.r.o. · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INTERNEXT 2000, s.r.o. is a Czech regional internet service provider offering affordable high-speed internet, TV, VoIP telephony, and hosting services primarily targeting customers in cities such as Zlín, Vsetín, and Uherské Hradiště. The company emphasizes competitive pricing and regional presence with nearly three decades of experience. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress, featuring clear navigation, mobile responsiveness, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. The technical infrastructure includes modern tracking tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager, but lacks some advanced security headers. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy-protected domain registration, which is common and justified for commercial entities. Overall, the company presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence with room for security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inext.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention inext.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
64
Employees
0
Customers
34
Third parties
30
Weak passwords
14%

18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for inext.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a regional ISP with a focus on affordable, high-speed internet and bundled TV services. Their business model revolves around residential and small business customers in the Czech Republic, leveraging fiber-optic GPON technology for gigabit speeds. The website indicates a stable market presence with 29 years of operation, supported by customer support channels and social media engagement. Partnerships include a related TV service domain. Revenue streams likely include internet subscriptions, TV packages, and hosting services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and privacy compliance, supporting customer trust and growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response information suggests limited public security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a commercial ISP website but with opportunities for improvement to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add explicit incident response and security policy information to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential weaknesses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INTERNEXT 2000, s.r.o.
Description
Hledáš nejlevnější internet ve Zlíně, Otrokovicích, Uherském Hradišti, Vsetíně, Kyjově, Kroměříži a okolí? Rychlý a levný internet od Internextu.
Key services
Internet broadband, Internet and TV bundles, VoIP telephony, Server hosting, Technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Video.js, Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language targeting regional Czech customers
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple contact channels including phone, email, and contact form
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing
  6. No visible security headers detected, opportunity for improvement
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected domain registration
  8. No terms of service page found explicitly
  9. Social media presence on Facebook linked
  10. Business claims 29 years of experience in internet services
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and uses JavaScript libraries including Video.js. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO optimizations such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning for faster load times and improved accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inext.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inext.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.