Skip to main content

Security report for indyeleven.com

Indy Eleven · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indy Eleven is a professional soccer team based in Indiana, established in 2013, competing in the USL Championship. The website serves as a digital platform for fan engagement, team information, and league affiliations. It is well-branded and consistent with the sports entertainment industry standards. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with React components, leveraging modern SEO and analytics tools, and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism indicating good privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management, though explicit security headers and incident response information are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but the association with USL and related domains supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and user-friendly, targeting soccer fans and the Indiana community.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indyeleven.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention indyeleven.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for indyeleven.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indy Eleven operates within the sports and entertainment sector, focusing on professional soccer. The business model revolves around sports events, merchandising, and community engagement. The team is positioned as a key player in the USL Championship, with partnerships across multiple USL leagues. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a clear target audience of sports fans and local supporters. The presence of multiple social media channels and league affiliations indicates a strong partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include expansion teams and active digital marketing. The business maintains a professional online presence but could improve transparency in security and contact information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of a reputable consent management platform (Osano), and privacy policy compliance. Tracking and advertising scripts are present but managed with user consent. However, the lack of visible security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and absence of explicit security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a potential risk factor for domain legitimacy. Enhancing security headers and publishing incident response contacts would strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indy Eleven
Description
THE WORLD’S GAME, INDIANA’S TEAM. Established on April 25, 2013, Indy Eleven identity reflects the club’s fans’ desire to have a name tied both to the culture of “the beautiful game” and the State of Indiana, with the name referencing the 11 players giving their all on the field of play in addition to paying homage to the 11th Regiment of Indiana Volunteers, which fought for the Union Army during the Civil War.
Key services
Professional soccer matches, Fan engagement, Merchandising, Community events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Osano Consent Management, Ecal Widget, Pumpjack Data Works SDK, Wisepops
Frameworks
React, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Privacy policy linked
  • Use of consent management platform (Osano)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Parsely, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, The Trade Desk
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
ShareThis, Wisepops, Constant Contact
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports team site for Indy Eleven soccer club.
  2. Content is rich with team info, league affiliations, and social media links.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and consent management for privacy compliance.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further verification.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to USL corporate site.
  7. Multiple analytics and advertising tracking scripts are used.
  8. No security policy or incident response info publicly visible.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack combining WordPress CMS with React for interactive components. SEO is enhanced via Yoast plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for rich search results. Multiple analytics and marketing tools are integrated, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, and TikTok Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple third-party scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by consolidating scripts and optimizing load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indyeleven.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indyeleven.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.