Skip to main content

Security report for indivsurvey.de

easyfeedback · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website indivsurvey.de is a login portal for the easyfeedback survey tool, a SaaS platform focused on survey creation and feedback collection. The business operates primarily in the technology sector, targeting businesses and individuals requiring survey solutions. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and good user experience, supporting mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indivsurvey.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention indivsurvey.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
76
Employees
0
Customers
76
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for indivsurvey.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

easyfeedback positions itself as a reliable provider of online survey tools, leveraging a SaaS business model. The company appears to have a medium-sized operation based in Germany, with clear contact information and structured data supporting legitimacy. The integration with easy-feedback.com as a partner domain suggests a broader ecosystem. The use of tracking and marketing tools indicates active customer engagement strategies. However, the lack of published privacy and terms policies could impact user trust and compliance. The company’s market presence is stable, focusing on technology-driven feedback solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with SSL encryption and secure login forms. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie consent requirements. However, the absence of security headers and published security policies reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be a gap in security culture. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the login page.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
easyfeedback
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
easyfeedback
Description
Survey tool platform for collecting feedback, operated by easyfeedback.
Key services
Survey creation, Feedback collection, User login and account management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
easy-feedback.com platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • SSL encryption
  • Secure login form with POST method
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for easyfeedback survey tool
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service links found on the page
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  4. Uses Google Tag Manager and tracking pixels for analytics and marketing
  5. Business contact info is embedded in JSON-LD structured data
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  8. Modern JavaScript and CSS assets used
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of scripts including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for consent management. FontAwesome icons are used for UI elements. The platform is hosted or integrated with easy-feedback.com, indicating a shared infrastructure. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is basic with canonical and alternate hreflang tags present. No CMS was detected explicitly. The site uses standard form POST methods for login, ensuring secure data submission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indivsurvey.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indivsurvey.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.