Skip to main content

Security report for indienudes.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indie Nudes operates as a niche adult content link aggregator website, providing curated links to external adult sites targeting mature audiences. The business model appears to be affiliate or referral based, without direct content hosting. The website has been registered since 2000, indicating a long-standing presence, but it lacks detailed business identity or contact information, which limits its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses minimal technology, primarily Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The design is basic with limited SEO and accessibility features, and there is no evidence of modern CMS or frameworks. Mobile optimization is poor, and no security headers or HTTPS enforcement were detected in the provided data, which poses security and privacy risks. From a security perspective, the site lacks fundamental protections such as privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response contacts. The use of Google Analytics without privacy disclosures further reduces compliance with data protection regulations. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the overall security posture is weak, exposing the site to potential risks. Overall, the website scores low to moderate on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indienudes.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adult content consumers through a simple affiliate/referral model, linking users to external adult sites. It occupies a niche market with limited competition but lacks clear business identity or branding. Revenue likely derives from affiliate commissions or advertising. The absence of contact or corporate information suggests a small-scale operation. The long domain age indicates stability, but the lack of transparency and minimal content limits growth potential. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The site’s ecosystem is minimal, relying on external adult sites and Google Analytics for tracking.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection laws. There is no incident response information or security contact channels, reducing readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics without privacy disclosures further weakens privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or injection points were detected, but the overall security hygiene is poor. Immediate improvements in encryption, policy publication, and security headers are necessary.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Improve website design, mobile optimization, and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing links to adult content sites, targeting mature audiences.
Key services
Providing curated links to adult content websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple adult content link aggregator with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact or business identity information provided.
  4. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without privacy disclosures.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  6. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. Website design and content quality are basic and not professionally polished.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present on the landing page.
  9. External links limited to one adult site and Google Analytics.
  10. No social media or contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a minimal technology stack with Google Analytics as the primary external script. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a static or simple HTML site. Hosting details are limited to registrar information (Mesh Digital Limited). Performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. The site lacks modern technical features and security configurations, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities. Enhancing technical infrastructure and adopting modern web standards would improve reliability and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indienudes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indienudes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.