Skip to main content

Security report for indexa-online.de

Indexa GmbH · Technology · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indexa GmbH is a German-based company specializing in wireless security technology products such as alarm systems, video surveillance, and smoke detectors, targeting small to medium-sized businesses and residential customers. The company has over 25 years of experience and offers modular, affordable, and certified security solutions. Their product range includes GSM cameras, digital wireless video door intercoms, and various safety sensors. The website provides detailed product information and downloadable catalogs but lacks modern web features and comprehensive privacy or security policies. Technically, the site is built with legacy tools and hosted on German servers, with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Social media presence is active on major platforms, enhancing brand visibility. Overall, the site is functional but requires modernization and enhanced compliance to improve trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indexa-online.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indexa GmbH operates as a manufacturer and wholesaler in the security technology sector, focusing on wireless alarm and surveillance systems. Their market positioning leverages long-standing experience and certifications like VdS and Q-Zeichen to build trust. The business model centers on providing cost-effective, modular security solutions for small and medium enterprises and residential users. The company maintains partnerships, such as with pentatech.de, and distributes product catalogs to support sales. Growth potential exists through digital modernization and enhanced online presence. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the website may limit customer engagement. The company’s competitive advantage lies in specialized wireless technology and integrated GSM solutions.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is currently weak due to the absence of HTTPS enforcement, lack of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of outdated web technologies may expose the site to vulnerabilities. However, the company’s products are certified by recognized bodies, indicating a focus on product security. To improve, the company should implement HTTPS, add security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish clear incident response channels. These steps will enhance compliance with GDPR and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process.
  5. Modernize the website technology stack to improve performance, accessibility, and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Indexa GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indexa GmbH
Description
Indexa offers security technology products optimized for small to medium-sized objects, including wireless alarm systems, digital wireless video surveillance, VdS-certified smoke detectors, and video door intercom systems. They provide modular alarm systems such as System 8000 and System 9000, GSM cameras, and various safety devices.
Key services
Wireless alarm systems, Digital wireless video surveillance, Wireless smoke detectors, Video door intercom systems, GSM surveillance cameras, Network and IP cameras, Safety and fire detection systems
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, Microsoft FrontPage 4.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is comprehensive regarding product offerings in wireless security technology.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
  4. Social media presence is active on Facebook, YouTube, Google+, and LinkedIn.
  5. Website uses outdated technology (Microsoft FrontPage 4.0) indicating possible technical debt.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available.
  8. No forms detected on the main page; limited data collection observed.
  9. Product information is detailed with downloadable catalogs and datasheets.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using legacy technology (Microsoft FrontPage 4.0) and hosted on servers under rzone.de. It lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site uses framesets, which are outdated and can hinder usability and SEO. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present on the main page, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user interaction. Overall, the technical infrastructure requires modernization to meet current web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indexa-online.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indexa-online.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.