Skip to main content

Security report for indexa.de

Indexa GmbH · Technology · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indexa GmbH is a German-based company specializing in wireless security technology products including alarm systems, video surveillance, and smoke detectors. With over 25 years of experience, they target small to medium-sized properties and businesses, offering certified and modular security solutions. Their product portfolio includes GSM-enabled cameras, digital wireless video door intercoms, and VdS-certified smoke detectors, positioning them as a trusted provider in the security technology sector. The website content is detailed and technical, aimed at customers seeking reliable and affordable security systems. Technically, the website uses outdated HTML frameset technology and lacks modern web standards such as responsive design and security headers. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or privacy and cookie policies, which impacts the site's security and compliance posture. Social media presence is established on major platforms, enhancing brand visibility. Overall, the site reflects a small but established business with solid product offerings but requires modernization and improved security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indexa.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indexa GmbH operates as a manufacturer and wholesaler in the security technology industry, focusing on wireless alarm and surveillance systems. Their competitive advantage lies in offering certified, modular, and affordable security solutions tailored for small to medium-sized enterprises and residential customers. The business model centers on product sales supported by detailed catalogs and technical documentation. The company maintains partnerships, such as with pentatech.de, and leverages social media for marketing. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation like GSM cameras and digital video door intercoms. The company’s market position is stable with a niche focus on wireless security technology in Germany. However, the website's outdated technical infrastructure may limit digital engagement and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but shows significant gaps. While the company’s products emphasize security features such as encrypted GSM communication and frequency hopping for video transmission, the website itself lacks critical security implementations. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no published privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or security contact information. The use of outdated HTML framesets and absence of modern web security best practices expose the site to potential risks. These gaps could undermine customer trust and compliance with regulations such as GDPR. The company should prioritize website security enhancements and transparency in data protection to align with their product security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Modernize the website layout to responsive HTML5/CSS3 standards to improve accessibility and user experience.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  5. Publish clear security incident response procedures and provide dedicated contact channels for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Indexa GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indexa GmbH
Description
Indexa GmbH offers wireless alarm systems, digital wireless video surveillance, VdS-certified wireless smoke detectors, and video door intercom systems optimized for small to medium-sized properties. They provide security technology solutions including GSM alarm systems, video surveillance cameras, and fire detection devices.
Key services
Wireless alarm systems, Digital wireless video surveillance, Wireless smoke detectors, Video door intercom systems, GSM alarm systems, Network and IP cameras, Fire and gas detection systems
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, Microsoft FrontPage 4.0 (generator meta tag), Frameset layout, CSS (linked stylesheet), USB 2.0 (hardware reference), GSM Quadband technology (hardware reference)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of VdS-certified products
  • GSM alarm systems with encrypted digital transmission
  • Frequency hopping for video transmission to prevent eavesdropping

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses outdated HTML frameset layout
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Google+, LinkedIn
  5. Focus on wireless security products with certifications
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No visible forms for data collection
  8. No security headers or HTTPS info provided
  9. Product information is detailed and technical
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using legacy technology, specifically Microsoft FrontPage 4.0 and HTML framesets, which are outdated and limit mobile optimization and accessibility. The hosting is managed via rzone.de, but no CMS or modern frameworks are detected. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics or tracking scripts are evident, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is likely moderate but could be improved with updated technology. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a critical technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure requires modernization to meet current web standards and security expectations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indexa.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indexa.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.