Skip to main content

Security report for indesia.org

IndesIA · Manufacturing · Spain

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IndesIA is a Spanish industry association focused on promoting the use of data and artificial intelligence among companies and SMEs in the Spanish manufacturing sector. The website positions the organization as a key enabler for the digital transformation of industry, targeting primarily Spanish industrial SMEs. The business model is that of an association providing advocacy, support, and promotion of AI technologies within the industrial ecosystem. The website content is professionally presented, with consistent branding and a clear focus on its mission. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a modern stack including Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with good SEO and accessibility basics in place. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and integrates reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, as well as the lack of publicly available WHOIS data, reduces transparency and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good technical and security foundations but could improve transparency and compliance by publishing privacy and terms policies and providing clearer contact information. The domain's WHOIS privacy protection is common but limits trust verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security policies, and improving contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indesia.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
65
Average
51
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IndesIA operates as an essential entity within the Spanish manufacturing sector, focusing on AI and data-driven innovation for SMEs. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche focus on industrial digital transformation and its role as an industry association. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and partnerships. The target customers are Spanish industrial SMEs seeking to adopt AI technologies. The organization maintains a professional online presence with LinkedIn integration, indicating active engagement with the industry ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing content updates and use of modern digital marketing tools. Partnerships appear limited to LinkedIn presence; no other partner domains were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and anti-bot measures via reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent mechanisms support GDPR compliance, though explicit privacy and terms policies are missing. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of updated libraries reduce risk. Overall, the security posture is solid for an association website but would benefit from formalized policies and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers for transparency and support.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IndesIA
Description
La Asociación que nace para impulsar el uso de los datos y la Inteligencia Artificial en empresas y PYMES de la industria española.
Key services
Promotion of data and AI usage in industry, Support for companies and SMEs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot, Elementor, Smart Slider 3, LifterLMS, Ultimate Member, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Spanish targeting Spanish industry SMEs
  2. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with popular plugins
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  5. Contact information is limited to forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  8. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking
  9. SEO and structured data are well implemented
  10. No obvious security vulnerabilities detected in scripts or forms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a well-established WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Elementor for page building, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Cookiebot for cookie management. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with structured data. Technical risks are low, but ongoing maintenance is recommended to keep plugins and libraries updated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indesia.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indesia.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.