Skip to main content

Security report for indeform.com

Indeform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indeform is a small technology company specializing in interactive technologies, cloud software solutions, artificial intelligence for business, and digital graphics. Their service offerings include cloud computing, AI, computer vision, virtual and augmented reality, and 3D visualizations, targeting businesses seeking innovative digital solutions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, hosted likely on Amazon AWS infrastructure. The technical stack includes Google Tag Manager and a third-party tracking service (lfeeder), indicating moderate digital maturity. Security posture is moderate with domain registration protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indeform.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention indeform.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
2
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-12-12 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for indeform.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –.indeform.com2025-12-12
  • –indeform.com2025-12-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indeform operates in the technology sector with a focus on delivering customized software and digital interactive solutions. The company appears to have a niche market position emphasizing innovation and artistic excellence. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises needing cloud, AI, and digital graphics solutions. The presence of three partner domains suggests a segmented approach to different technology verticals. The domain age of over 10 years supports business stability. However, the lack of visible contact details and compliance documentation may impact trust and customer acquisition. The company likely generates revenue through project-based software development and digital content creation services.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (inferred but not explicitly confirmed in HTML), and domain registration includes multiple prohibitive statuses enhancing domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or security contact information, indicating gaps in compliance and transparency. Tracking scripts are present, but no consent mechanism is visible, raising privacy concerns. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a privacy impact assessment and implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indeform
Description
Indeform is an IT, visual technologies and digital graphics development company focused on innovation, artistic and technical excellence. They deliver customized software solutions including cloud computing, artificial intelligence, computer vision, interactive technologies, virtual and augmented reality, digital 3D visualizations, and colorful animations to boost business value.
Key services
Cloud solutions, AI solutions, Computer vision development, Software development, Interactive technologies, Virtual reality, Augmented reality, Animation, 3D visualizations, VFX
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, lfeeder tracker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, lfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
lfeeder
Marketing tools
lfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage
  3. Website uses modern tracking and marketing scripts but lacks visible privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. Multiple related domains are linked as partner sites for different business verticals
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content
  6. Website content is professional and focused on technology and digital services
  7. No forms detected on the homepage to collect user data
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML and CSS, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses Google Tag Manager and a third-party tracking script (lfeeder) for analytics and marketing. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS nameservers. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with no visible errors or broken elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. The absence of CMS suggests a custom or static site approach, which reduces complexity but may limit scalability. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indeform.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indeform.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.