Skip to main content

Security report for incy.io

Falcony · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Falcony is a technology company specializing in mobile-first incident reporting and compliance solutions. Their flagship product, Observe, enables users to report incidents directly from their mobile devices, streamlining compliance processes. Recently, Falcony joined the WeKomply family, enhancing its market position and expanding its compliance solution offerings. The website is professionally designed using Webflow CMS, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. It employs modern technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of visible contact information and security incident response details suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate and professional SaaS business with a focus on compliance and user privacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching incy.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Falcony operates in the technology sector, targeting organizations requiring efficient incident reporting and compliance management. Their SaaS business model includes free trials to attract users. The recent acquisition by WeKomply indicates strategic growth and integration into a broader compliance ecosystem. The company leverages partnerships and third-party services such as Hubspot and Vimeo to enhance marketing and content delivery. While the website lacks explicit contact details, it demonstrates strong GDPR compliance and transparent cookie policies, which are critical for trust in this market segment. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and the implementation of Cookiebot for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. Security headers are likely present given the modern hosting and CMS platform, although explicit header details were not provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts is managed with consent, reducing privacy risks. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency and readiness perception. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security maturity and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  4. Provide clear company contact details including emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Falcony
Description
Falcony offers a product called Observe that brings incident reporting directly to mobile devices, enabling users to report incidents easily and efficiently. The company recently joined the WeKomply family of compliance solutions.
Key services
Incident reporting mobile app, Compliance management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Vimeo embeds, Cloudflare (implied by cookies)
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hubspot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Hubspot tracking, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hubspot, Pipedrive
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Webflow CMS with good design and mobile optimization
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot is implemented
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected and not publicly available
  6. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are used with consent
  7. No security challenge or WAF blocking detected
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and Vimeo embeds. It is hosted likely behind Cloudflare or Identity Digital infrastructure, providing robust performance and security features. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with efficient content delivery networks in use. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though accessibility could be improved. The technical stack supports a professional SaaS offering but would benefit from additional security transparency and enhanced contact mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with incy.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review incy.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.