Skip to main content

Security report for inail.it

INAIL - Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro · Government · Italy

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INAIL is the Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, operating as a government agency providing mandatory insurance, prevention, research, and rehabilitation services related to workplace injuries and occupational diseases. The website serves a broad audience including workers, employers, institutions, and stakeholders involved in workplace safety and insurance. It holds a strong national market position as an authoritative public institution. The site offers key services such as insurance coverage, safety programs, research initiatives, prosthetic and rehabilitation services, and statistical data dissemination. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including Adobe Helix RUM, Google reCAPTCHA, Adobe Document Services Viewer SDK, and Dynatrace monitoring. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. It integrates multiple social media platforms and uses advanced analytics and monitoring tools. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, uses security headers, and implements bot protection mechanisms. However, explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly visible. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, confirming legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, providing a trustworthy digital presence for INAIL. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enhancing transparency around security headers and third-party script integrity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inail.it

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INAIL operates as a large government entity focused on workplace insurance and safety in Italy. Its competitive advantage lies in its statutory mandate and comprehensive service offerings spanning insurance, prevention, research, and rehabilitation. The business model is public service-oriented, funded and regulated by the Italian government. Revenue streams are primarily from mandatory insurance premiums and government funding. Target customers include employers, employees, and public institutions. Growth indicators include active digital transformation and engagement with stakeholders via multiple channels. The partnership ecosystem includes collaborations with academic, scientific, and governmental bodies. The website reflects a mature operation with strong market presence and public trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of security headers, and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. Monitoring tools like Dynatrace and Adobe Helix RUM are employed for performance and security oversight. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears robust but could benefit from enhanced communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance visible security headers and ensure all third-party scripts have integrity attributes.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around data retention policies and user privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INAIL - Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
Description
INAIL is the Italian National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work, providing insurance, prevention, research, and rehabilitation services related to workplace injuries and occupational diseases.
Key services
Insurance coverage for workplace injuries, Prevention and safety programs, Research and technological innovation, Rehabilitation and prosthetic services, Statistical data and publications, Online services access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Adobe Document Services Viewer SDK, Splide.js carousel, Bootstrap (implied by classes and dropdowns), jQuery (implied by data-toggle attributes), Adobe Launch (Adobe DTM), Dynatrace monitoring
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Session check endpoints for logged-in users
  • Use of Adobe Helix RUM for monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Dynatrace, Adobe Launch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Dynatrace, Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, Dynatrace
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The website is a well-maintained official government portal for INAIL.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professionally presented, and regularly updated.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and accessibility features.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  5. Social media presence is extensive and official.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers visible on the homepage; likely available on dedicated contact pages.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and accessible.
  8. No visible terms of service page found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a high level of technical maturity. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for carousels and integrates Adobe Document Services for PDF viewing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with ARIA labels and keyboard navigation aids. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management. Opportunities exist to further optimize performance and enhance security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inail.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inail.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.