Skip to main content

Is in.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - City of Carmel

in.gov Security Report Summary

in.gov received a security score of 61 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers City of Carmel's website security posture. City of Carmel operates in the Government industry in United States.

The City of Carmel's official website serves as a comprehensive municipal portal offering residents, businesses, and visitors access to city hall information, departments, services, events, news, and contact details. The site is well-positioned as a local government authority, providing essential public services and community engagement tools. Its target audience includes local residents, businesses, and tourists seeking city resources and updates. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, AlpineJS, Google Tag Manager, and Azure Application Insights, hosted on the CivicPlus CMS platform. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. The presence of telemetry and analytics tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and anti-forgery tokens, but lacks explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No incident response contacts or security certifications are visible. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency. The website is trustworthy and professional, with clear contact information and official social media links. No adult or inappropriate content is present, making it safe for general audiences. The lack of WHOIS data is typical for government domains and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding a security.txt file, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing incident response visibility.

The security scan identified 33 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI 1.14.1, AlpineJS 3.14.1, Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, Monsido Heatmaps, CivicPlus CMS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

in.gov favicon

Is in.gov Safe? Security Analysis for City of Carmel

https://in.gov

Check if in.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application Insights+2 more
Analyzed Completed
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Government avg (70)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for in.gov

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

The City of Carmel's official website serves as a comprehensive municipal portal offering residents, businesses, and visitors access to city hall information, departments, services, events, news, and contact details. The site is well-positioned as a local government authority, providing essential public services and community engagement tools. Its target audience includes local residents, businesses, and tourists seeking city resources and updates. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, AlpineJS, Google Tag Manager, and Azure Application Insights, hosted on the CivicPlus CMS platform. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. The presence of telemetry and analytics tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and anti-forgery tokens, but lacks explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No incident response contacts or security certifications are visible. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency. The website is trustworthy and professional, with clear contact information and official social media links. No adult or inappropriate content is present, making it safe for general audiences. The lack of WHOIS data is typical for government domains and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding a security.txt file, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing incident response visibility.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application InsightsMonsido HeatmapsCivicPlus CMS

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep in.gov under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for in.gov.

Security Headers

5 findings

55/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

53/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

5 findings

60/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The City of Carmel operates as a municipal government entity providing essential services and information to its community. Its competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive digital presence, facilitating citizen engagement and service delivery. Revenue streams are typical of government funding rather than commercial sales. The target customer segments include residents, local businesses, and visitors. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital engagement tools. Partnerships with local parks, GIS mapping, and tourism sites enhance service offerings. The website reflects a stable and mature operation with a focus on transparency and community service.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options presents potential risks. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts limit transparency and responsiveness to security issues. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. The use of third-party analytics and monitoring tools requires ongoing vigilance to prevent vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is functional but would benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

City of Carmel

Description:

Official website of the City of Carmel, Indiana providing information about city hall, departments and services, resident and business resources, events, news, and contact information.

Key Services:
City Hall informationDepartments and ServicesResident ResourcesBusiness ResourcesEvent CalendarsNews and AlertsPayment CenterPublic Records Requests
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application InsightsMonsido HeatmapsCivicPlus CMS
Frameworks:
CivicPlus CMS platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-forgery token implemented in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Azure Application Insights for telemetry

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)Azure Application Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Azure Application InsightsMonsido Heatmaps
Marketing Tools:
Monsido Page Assist
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a municipal government portal for City of Carmel, Indiana

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the in.gov security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete in.gov security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailanyone.net -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:[email protected]
Forensic Reports:[email protected]

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(319 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:208.40.244.65
Name Servers:
addilyn.ns.cloudflare.com
darwin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mail3.egov.com
5: mail1.egov.com
SOA:Serial: 2412175640, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled(Algorithm: 13)

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:181ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailanyone.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does in.gov compare?

See how in.gov stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the CivicPlus CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and AlpineJS. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Azure Application Insights for analytics and telemetry. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich media content. There is an opportunity to optimize loading times and implement advanced security headers. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but requires ongoing maintenance to address emerging security and compliance challenges.
Professional Report

Download the in.gov report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the in.gov report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about in.gov

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website