Skip to main content

Security report for impresedegnedifiducia.it

Imprese Degne Di Fiducia · Other · Italy

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Imprese Degne Di Fiducia operates a certification platform aimed at identifying and endorsing trustworthy businesses across Europe, with a strong presence in Italy and eight other European countries. The website serves as a portal for companies to register, verify their certification status, and for customers to check certified businesses. The platform emphasizes transparency and reputation, boasting over 280,000 satisfied customers. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics. While the site is mobile-optimized and professionally designed, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, but security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy present but no terms of service or incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching impresedegnedifiducia.it

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a reputable certification authority for trustworthy companies, targeting European entrepreneurs and customers seeking reliable business partners. Its competitive advantage lies in its multi-country presence and a large certified customer base. The business model revolves around certification issuance and maintaining a verified company directory. Revenue streams likely include certification fees and possibly advertising or partnerships. The multilingual partner ecosystem supports market penetration across diverse European regions. Growth indicators include a significant number of certified clients and expansion into multiple countries. Strategic observations suggest focusing on strengthening digital trust signals and expanding direct contact channels to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Data collection is conducted via forms with required fields, but no advanced input sanitization or security measures are evident. Compliance with GDPR is basic, with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present but lacking detailed data retention or processing disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a certification platform but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Develop and publish detailed terms of service and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data processing, retention policies, and providing clear user rights information.
  4. Introduce direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Imprese Degne Di Fiducia
Description
Il sito offre un certificato per imprese con reputazione impeccabile, rivolto a imprenditori e clienti in Europa, con presenza in 9 paesi europei e oltre 280.000 clienti soddisfatti.
Key services
Certificazione di imprese affidabili, Elenco aziende certificate, Registrazione e verifica aziende
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, jQuery Cookie, jQuery Vector Map
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a certification service for trustworthy companies in Europe.
  2. Content is in Italian with multilingual partner sites linked.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Use of common tracking and marketing tools like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS usage assumed but not verified.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies.
  8. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and interactivity. Integration of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics supports marketing and user behavior analysis but requires careful privacy management. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and optimized images for desktop and mobile. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO optimization is minimal, with no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not explicitly identified, limiting deeper infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with impresedegnedifiducia.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review impresedegnedifiducia.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.