Skip to main content

Security report for imco.nl

International Media Company B.V. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IMC Bill operates as a billing support and customer service provider for various internet subscription-based websites, primarily adult membership services such as AdultPrime.com. The website serves consumers who notice charges labeled as IMCBill on their credit card statements and seek clarification or cancellation support. The business model focuses on subscription management and billing dispute resolution. The company claims to be International Media Company B.V., but domain registration details are not publicly available, which raises some concerns about transparency. Technically, the website uses common web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and Bootstrap, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The site is accessible and functional but exhibits basic design and content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imco.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention imco.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for imco.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets consumers affected by subscription billing under the IMCBill descriptor, positioning itself as a niche service provider in billing support for adult content membership sites. Revenue likely derives from service fees related to subscription management and customer support. The partnership with AdultPrime.com and use of Sansylgroup.com email domain suggest a small but focused operational ecosystem. The lack of WHOIS transparency and minimal public business information limit the ability to fully assess market position and growth potential. The business appears to maintain a straightforward customer support approach with phone and email contact options.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no visible cookie consent or privacy compliance enforcement, which may expose the company to regulatory risks, especially under GDPR. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness. No forms actively collect sensitive data, which limits attack surface but also indicates limited user interaction capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from improvements in headers, encryption enforcement, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Establish and display a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance website design and content quality to improve user experience and professional appearance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
International Media Company B.V.
Description
Provides billing support and customer service for various internet websites and merchants, specifically handling subscription billing under the descriptor IMCBill on credit card statements.
Key services
Billing support, Customer service, Subscription management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Google Fonts, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (due to Google Analytics and Facebook SDK usage)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data except commented out contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered under the queried name.
  3. Website provides billing support information for subscription services, mainly adult content related.
  4. Contact information is provided with email and phone number.
  5. No visible cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy compliance indicators.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. Website uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and social media integration.
  8. Content quality and design are basic but functional.
  9. No forms actively collecting user data; contact form is commented out.
  10. Adult content indication due to references to AdultPrime and subscription billing for adult memberships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard front-end technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and third-party integrations such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social media features. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. The site lacks a CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a simple static or lightly dynamic site. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or ARIA roles detected. The commented-out contact form suggests limited active data collection, reducing complexity but also user engagement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imco.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imco.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.