Skip to main content

Security report for imarc.com

Imarc · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Imarc is a well-established digital agency based in Boston, specializing in strategy, creative services, performance marketing, development, and digital transformation. The company positions itself as an award-winning agency targeting businesses seeking comprehensive digital solutions. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with strong branding and clear service offerings. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and popular font services, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating good security hygiene. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact details suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is common for agencies. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious, with recommendations to enhance security policy disclosures and verify domain registration details for improved trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imarc.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Imarc operates in the technology and media sectors as a digital agency providing strategic and creative digital services. Its business model focuses on service delivery to corporate clients requiring digital marketing, development, and transformation solutions. The company leverages partnerships and tracking tools to optimize marketing efforts. The website content and social media presence indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a strong market position in Boston. The lack of visible subsidiaries or parent company suggests independent operation. The agency's competitive advantage lies in its award-winning status and comprehensive service portfolio. Growth indicators include active marketing and analytics integration. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining transparency in domain registration and security policies to reinforce credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information limits the site's transparency and readiness for security incidents. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security cultures. The use of third-party tracking pixels like ZoomInfo and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, balanced by privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Imarc Group, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Imarc
Description
Imarc is an award-winning digital agency specializing in strategy, creative, performance marketing, development, and digital transformation.
Key services
Strategy, Creative, Performance marketing, Development, Digital transformation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Font Awesome, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, ZoomInfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ZoomInfo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Professional digital agency with strong branding and content.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating privacy protection or registration anomaly.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators found in scripts or external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and popular font services like Typekit and Google Fonts. The HTML and CSS are valid and optimized for performance with deferred and async script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but can be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imarc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imarc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.