Skip to main content

Security report for imaosta.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.imaosta.com is a Japanese-language informational and affiliate marketing site focused on hair removal and medical hair removal salons and clinics in the Shinjuku area of Tokyo. It provides rankings, detailed descriptions, and affiliate links to popular salons, targeting local consumers interested in beauty and hair removal services. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site includes tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro and affiliate links from multiple affiliate networks. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and absence of privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site offers relevant content but lacks critical security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imaosta.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention imaosta.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for imaosta.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a niche affiliate marketing platform targeting the Shinjuku beauty market, specifically hair removal services. It leverages affiliate partnerships with known salons and clinics, providing localized content and rankings to attract potential customers. The business model relies on affiliate commissions from referrals. The site’s market position is local and specialized, with no evidence of a larger corporate backing or parent company. Growth potential depends on maintaining affiliate relationships and improving trust signals. The absence of clear company contact information and domain registration data may hinder credibility with users and partners.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. Key gaps include missing HTTPS confirmation, lack of security headers, no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or security contact information. The presence of third-party tracking scripts without clear privacy disclosures further impacts compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant trust concern. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy policies, and transparent contact channels to improve security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify secure configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Verify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and rankings for hair removal (脱毛) and medical hair removal salons and clinics in the Shinjuku area of Tokyo, Japan. It offers detailed descriptions of popular salons, their features, and locations, targeting customers interested in beauty and hair removal services in Shinjuku.
Key services
Hair removal salon rankings, Medical hair removal clinic recommendations, Affiliate links to salon official pages, Local salon location information
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Rentracks
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Affiliate marketing links
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. Site uses affiliate marketing with multiple external affiliate domains.
  6. Site content is in Japanese and targets local customers in Shinjuku, Tokyo.
  7. Basic technical implementation with no advanced frameworks detected.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS status unknown due to lack of header data.
  9. Tracking via Research Artisan Pro analytics script detected.
  10. No social media links or company legal information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML5 with Shift_JIS charset and basic CSS styling. No CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks are detected. The site includes affiliate marketing scripts and tracking pixels from Research Artisan Pro. Mobile optimization is basic but present. SEO is supported by meta viewport tags and canonical link. Accessibility features are minimal. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization techniques observed. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. The site would benefit from modernization including HTTPS enforcement, improved accessibility, and enhanced mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imaosta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imaosta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.