Skip to main content

Security report for image-validator.com

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates image-validator.com, a specialized online tool designed to audit and validate product images for e-commerce businesses. The service helps online retailers ensure their product images meet the requirements of various advertising and comparison shopping platforms, enhancing their marketing effectiveness. The company is positioned as a niche service provider within the e-commerce sector, supported by a parent company, Profitak group, s.r.o., and maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple social media channels. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare for security and performance. The site is hosted on servers managed by Gigaserver.cz and integrates third-party services such as Calendly for scheduling and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses Cloudflare's bot management, and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security policies or incident response contacts are not published, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business objectives. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility to further strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching image-validator.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets e-commerce businesses seeking to optimize product image quality for advertising platforms. Its business model revolves around providing a free diagnostic tool with options for contact and sample results, likely supporting upselling or consulting services. The market position is focused and specialized, leveraging partnerships and localized versions of the service for different regions. Revenue streams may include premium services or consulting via the parent company. The partnership ecosystem includes related sites and platforms enhancing service reach. Growth indicators include active social media presence and integration with major advertising networks.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare providing bot management and CDN services. Cookie consent is managed professionally with CookieHub, supporting GDPR compliance. The absence of DNSSEC and explicit security policies are gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contacts. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ07139365
Registration number
07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Ensure the best quality of your product images and attract more customers on advertising platforms.
Key services
Image validation for e-commerce product feeds, Compliance checking for advertising platforms, Diagnostic reports via email
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by JS bundle naming and structure), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Calendly widget, CookieHub consent management, Cloudflare (WAF and CDN), Profitak tracking scripts
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management (__cf_bm cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Profitak tracking
Marketing tools
Calendly, CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a free online tool for product image validation targeting e-commerce businesses.
  2. Strong integration with multiple advertising and comparison shopping platforms.
  3. Good privacy and cookie consent implementation with CookieHub.
  4. Social media presence across major platforms supports trust and marketing.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  6. Domain registration and WHOIS data consistent with business claims.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and third-party services for analytics and marketing.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No phone contact information found; communication primarily via email and contact form.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with asynchronous loading of scripts for analytics, marketing, and consent management. Hosting is provided by Gigaserver.cz with DNS managed via multiple nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses multiple third-party integrations including Calendly and Profitak tracking scripts. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in DNS security and accessibility could be addressed to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with image-validator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review image-validator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.