Skip to main content

Security report for imadvocatus.com

Imants Muižnieks · Other · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Imants Muižnieks is a sworn advocate and Doctor of Law based in Latvia, providing a broad range of legal services including public and private partnership consulting, contract drafting, family law, commercial law, criminal defense, and administrative law. The website positions him as an experienced legal professional with academic credentials and a clear focus on serving both individual and corporate clients. The business operates as a small legal practice with a professional and consistent online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme, with integrations for Google Analytics and WPForms for contact management. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imadvocatus.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets clients in Latvia needing legal services across multiple sectors including real estate, government, and private law. The business model is a professional services practice with revenue likely from client consultations and legal representation. The website content and CV highlight a strong academic and professional background, which supports market positioning as a credible legal expert. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The site lacks social media presence, which may limit broader market reach. The use of standard WordPress plugins and Google Analytics suggests moderate digital maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in regulatory compliance that should be addressed to build client trust and meet GDPR requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The contact form uses WPForms with validation but no explicit anti-spam or CAPTCHA mechanisms detected. Google Analytics tracking is implemented with an opt-out mechanism, showing some privacy consideration. Overall, the site is secure for typical use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection.
  3. Create a security.txt file to provide vulnerability disclosure information and contact channels.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Imants Muižnieks
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Imants Muižnieks
Description
Imants Muižnieks is a sworn advocate and Doctor of Law offering legal services including public and private partnership, concessions, contract drafting, private law, labor law, real estate legal transactions, family law, inheritance issues, commercial law, municipal law, construction law, administrative law, immigration, and residence permits.
Key services
Legal consultations, Contract and document drafting, Legal representation in courts, Public and private partnership advice, Criminal law defense, Administrative offense consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Astra Theme, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, WPForms Lite, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics opt-out mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site for a sworn advocate in Latvia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Uses WordPress with Astra theme and standard plugins for analytics and forms.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Good SSL configuration and HTTPS usage.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Astra theme, leveraging Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. It uses MonsterInsights for Google Analytics integration and WPForms Lite for contact form functionality. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses modern SEO plugins (All in One SEO). Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. No major technical issues or broken elements were detected. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting is via Namecheap, Inc as registrar, but hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small professional website with room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imadvocatus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imadvocatus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.