Skip to main content

Security report for im-apps.net

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website im-apps.net appears to serve as a technical endpoint hosting privacy sandbox attestation files within an Amazon S3 bucket environment, utilizing Akamai DNS services. The domain is registered since 2013 with Amazon Registrar, Inc., indicating a stable registration history. However, the website content is minimal, consisting primarily of XML data listing files related to privacy sandbox attestations, with no visible business or marketing content, contact information, or user-facing pages. This suggests the site functions more as a data repository or backend service rather than a traditional commercial website. From a technical perspective, the site uses Amazon Registrar and Akamai name servers but lacks DNSSEC and visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided data, indicating potential security hardening opportunities. No scripts, analytics, or marketing tools were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which limits compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and incident response contacts. The domain status locks provide some protection against unauthorized changes, but the lack of visible security best practices and policies reduces trustworthiness. No adult or questionable content was detected, and the site is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website is low in content quality and business credibility, with minimal technical implementation and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements should focus on enhancing security configurations, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear business and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching im-apps.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention im-apps.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
20%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for im-apps.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain im-apps.net is registered since 2013 and appears to be associated with technical services related to privacy sandbox attestations, likely targeting developers or partners involved in privacy-focused web technologies. The lack of marketing content or business descriptions suggests a niche or backend service model rather than a direct-to-consumer business. There is no evidence of revenue streams, partnerships, or customer engagement mechanisms on the site. The use of Amazon Registrar and Akamai DNS indicates reliance on reputable infrastructure providers. The business model likely revolves around providing privacy sandbox data or related services, but this is not explicitly stated. The absence of contact or corporate information limits the ability to assess market position or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, lack of DNSSEC, and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The domain has status locks that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, which is positive. However, the lack of visible security best practices and compliance documentation indicates a low maturity level in security governance. There are no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the provided content, but the minimal content limits comprehensive security assessment. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not demonstrated due to missing policies and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and enforce secure connections.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and appears to be an XML listing of S3 bucket contents related to privacy sandbox attestations.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided on the website.
  4. No scripts, forms, or external marketing/analytics tools detected in the HTML content.
  5. Domain is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. and uses Akamai name servers.
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is technical and safe.
  9. Website appears to be a storage or data endpoint rather than a traditional business website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website content is served as XML listing files in an Amazon S3 bucket, indicating a backend or data storage role rather than a traditional website. The domain uses Amazon Registrar and Akamai DNS servers but lacks DNSSEC. No CMS, frameworks, or client-side technologies were detected in the provided HTML content. The site shows minimal technical implementation with no visible scripts, forms, or analytics. Performance is likely moderate given the use of Akamai CDN services, but no explicit performance data is available. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to minimal content. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data beyond the XML bucket listing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with im-apps.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review im-apps.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.