Skip to main content

Security report for ilunionconsultoria.com

ILUNION · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ILUNION Consultoría presents itself as a professional consulting firm specializing in transformation and diversity services. The website content is well-structured with appropriate meta tags and uses modern web technologies such as Drupal CMS and Font Awesome icons. Marketing and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Visual Website Optimizer are integrated, indicating a focus on digital marketing and user behavior analysis. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing WHOIS registration data, raises concerns about compliance and domain legitimacy. The security posture is moderate but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ilunionconsultoria.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leader in transformation and diversity consulting, targeting businesses seeking these services. The business model is service-oriented consulting with a focus on corporate clients. The website branding is consistent and professional, with trust signals such as domain verification by Google and Facebook. However, the lack of explicit contact information and company registration details on the site limits transparency. The use of advanced marketing tools suggests an active approach to customer engagement and conversion optimization.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers in the provided data. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found. The integration of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires careful management. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration details reduce trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity appears moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ILUNION
Description
En ILUNION Consultoría somos referentes en transformación y diversidad.
Key services
transformation consulting, diversity consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS (stable9 theme), Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. Content is professional consulting services focused on transformation and diversity
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in the provided HTML
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in WHOIS registry
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Website uses Drupal CMS with stable9 theme and Font Awesome icons
  9. Good SEO and meta tags present including Open Graph and Twitter cards
  10. No forms explicitly found in the truncated HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a stable9 theme and uses Font Awesome 6 for icons. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and marketing. The site appears mobile-optimized and uses canonical and alternate hreflang tags for SEO. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS version or hosting provider details are visible. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ilunionconsultoria.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ilunionconsultoria.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.