Skip to main content

Security report for ilguciems.lv

Iļģuciems · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iļģuciems is a well-established Latvian company specializing in the supply of construction materials and doors, with over 30 years of market presence. The company serves both retail and wholesale customers, offering a broad range of products including roofing materials, waterproofing, thermal insulation, doors, and general building materials. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting customers primarily in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and several plugins for multilingual support, SEO, and user interaction. The site is mobile-optimized and includes modern tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are recommended for compliance and trust. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ilguciems.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on construction materials and doors. Its long-standing presence in the Latvian market indicates a stable business model with established supplier and customer relationships. The website's multilingual capability suggests an intent to serve diverse customer segments including Latvian, Russian, and English speakers. The business model combines wholesale and retail distribution, likely generating revenue from both direct consumer sales and business clients. The presence of structured data and SEO optimization indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer acquisition. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise. The company maintains clear contact information and legal registration details, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published privacy policy and terms of service pages may expose the company to compliance risks, particularly under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could delay mitigation of security issues. Regular updates and security best practices should be maintained to ensure ongoing protection.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, processing, and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “IĻĢUCIEMS”
Registration number
LV40003009711
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iļģuciems
Description
Iļģuciems ir vairāk kā 30 gadus tirgū esošs uzticams celtniecības materiālu un durvju piegādātājs Latvijā, nodrošinot augstas kvalitātes produktus un servisu.
Key services
Supply of roofing materials, Waterproofing products, Thermal insulation, Doors, Building materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4.16, Enfold Theme 4.6.3.1, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual plugin), Owl Carousel, FancyBox, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Google Tag Manager implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism present
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers, email, and physical address
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with multiple plugins and tracking tools
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; SSL is enabled
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or suspicious links
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Good SEO and multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English)
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.4.16 with the Enfold theme and uses multiple plugins such as Contact Form 7, WPML for multilingual support, and Ditty News Ticker. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries like Owl Carousel and FancyBox for UI enhancements. The presence of reCAPTCHA v3 indicates attention to bot mitigation. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Rank Math plugin. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. However, hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ilguciems.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ilguciems.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.