Skip to main content

Security report for iizi.lv

GrECo Latvia, SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GrECo Latvia, SIA operates as an insurance brokerage and risk management service provider based in Latvia. The company offers a broad portfolio of insurance products tailored for both private individuals and business clients, including accident insurance, cyber risk insurance, professional liability, and sector-specific insurance solutions. The website branding and content position the company as a trusted local player with a family-friendly workplace reputation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.4.3, utilizing common libraries such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though lacking advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iizi.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iizi.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for iizi.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets private individuals and business sectors in Latvia, focusing on insurance brokerage and risk consultancy. Its business model revolves around providing tailored insurance solutions and risk analysis services. The presence of multiple insurance partners and a dedicated contact infrastructure indicates a stable operational setup. The website content and navigation suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market position in the Latvian insurance brokerage sector. The partnership with IIZI and presence on Facebook enhance its market reach and customer engagement. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the comprehensive service offering and professional presentation imply a sustainable business model.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is indicated by the privacy policy and cookie banner. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility by adding ARIA attributes and improving semantic HTML structure.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and meta description tags to increase search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GrECo Latvia, SIA
Description
GrECo Latvia provides insurance brokerage and risk management services, offering a wide range of insurance products for private individuals and businesses including accident insurance, cyber risk insurance, professional liability, and sector-specific insurance solutions.
Key services
Accident insurance, Construction insurance, Drone insurance, IT professional liability insurance, Cyber risk insurance, Professional liability insurance, Risk analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes consent management
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian language.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain email and phone numbers.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanism.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age details extracted.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
  10. SEO and accessibility could be improved with additional metadata and ARIA attributes.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS version 6.4.3 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management. The site loads CSS and JS resources efficiently and is mobile responsive. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information is available. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, but there is room for improvement in SEO metadata, accessibility, and security headers. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iizi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iizi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.