Skip to main content

Security report for iitr.de

IITR Datenschutz GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IITR Datenschutz GmbH is a German-based company specializing in data protection and information security services. They provide a range of solutions including external data protection officer services, compliance kits, audits, certifications, and online training. Their target audience includes small and medium-sized enterprises as well as larger organizations seeking cost-effective and expert data protection solutions. The company maintains a strong market position with certified products and a professional online presence supported by client testimonials and social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap framework, offering a responsive and well-structured user experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and CAPTCHA-protected forms, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is partially addressed but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies in the visible content. WHOIS data shows no privacy protection but has an unusual domain status that warrants further verification. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical maturity with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iitr.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on data protection and compliance services. Their business model revolves around providing software kits, consulting, training, and certification services tailored to various company sizes. The presence of multiple client logos and certifications indicates a well-established client base and trust in the market. Their multilingual offerings and eLearning platform suggest a scalable and modern approach to service delivery. Social media integration and active content such as blogs and videos enhance their marketing and customer engagement strategies. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on German and European markets, leveraging certifications like Europrivacy to differentiate themselves. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses CAPTCHA to protect form submissions, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which are recommended for mature security practices. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and cookie policy pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included and maintain up-to-date dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IITR Datenschutz GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IITR Datenschutz GmbH
Description
Als externer Datenschutzbeauftragter unterstützen wir Unternehmen mit kosteneffizienten Datenschutz-Lösungen sowie mit Rechtsberatung im Datenschutzrecht.
Key services
Datenschutz-Kit, Externer Datenschutzbeauftragter, Datenschutz Schulungen, Audit und Zertifizierung, Hinweisgebersystem, ISMS-Kit, Compliance-Kit 2.0
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA (Friendly-Challenge), JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
friendly-challenge (reCAPTCHA alternative)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on data protection and compliance services.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and forms are provided.
  4. Strong branding and professional design with consistent use of company logos and colors.
  5. Social media presence across major platforms is evident.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Joomla) with Bootstrap framework.
  8. Security best practices partially implemented; HTTPS and CAPTCHA used but security headers missing.
  9. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information.
  10. WHOIS data is limited but does not raise major red flags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 5 framework, utilizing jQuery and Font Awesome for UI components and icons. It uses JSON-LD structured data for SEO and business information, improving search engine visibility. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously to optimize performance. The presence of reCAPTCHA alternative (friendly-challenge) indicates attention to bot mitigation. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in CSS/JS optimization and caching. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a modern, user-friendly, and secure web presence with opportunities for further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iitr.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iitr.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.