Skip to main content

Security report for iexpert24.pl

Other · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iExpert.pl is a Polish website specializing in professional liability insurance services, targeting professionals seeking OC zawodowe insurance. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and WPBakery page builder, indicating a standard modern CMS infrastructure. The technical setup includes common web fonts and icon libraries but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The domain is well-established since 2006, suggesting a stable business presence. However, the website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security best practices, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iexpert24.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears focused on providing insurance services related to professional liability in Poland. The market positioning is not explicitly stated, but the domain age and content suggest an established small business. The business model revolves around service provision in the insurance sector, targeting professionals needing liability coverage. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the available data. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, but lacks detailed business disclosures and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS assumed but no explicit security headers detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security policies are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Forms and data collection mechanisms are not clearly identified, limiting assessment of data protection practices. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security maturity and would benefit from implementing standard security and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to offer professional liability insurance services (Ubezpieczenia odpowiedzialności zawodowej, OC zawodowe) targeting professionals in Poland.
Key services
professional liability insurance, OC zawodowe (professional civil liability insurance)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Poppins), Yoast SEO plugin, Avada Theme, WPBakery Page Builder (js_composer)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contacts found in the visible content.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Avada theme and WPBakery page builder.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and WPBakery page builder, a common and mature platform. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and Font Awesome for icons. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with Yoast SEO plugin detected. Performance is moderate with some deferred script loading. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, indicating areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iexpert24.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iexpert24.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.