Skip to main content

Security report for ideris.com.br

Ideris · E-commerce · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ideris is a leading Brazilian e-commerce technology company specializing in marketplace integration and multichannel sales optimization. The company offers a comprehensive hub platform that consolidates product management, pricing automation, invoice issuance, and logistics management, targeting medium to large e-commerce operators. Recognized as a top technology partner by Mercado Livre for two consecutive years, Ideris holds important certifications such as AWS Partner Qualified Software and SOC 2 Audit, reinforcing its market leadership and trustworthiness. The website reflects a mature digital presence with advanced search capabilities, rich content, and multi-channel marketing tools. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols represent significant security risks that could impact user trust and data protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ideris.com.br

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ideris operates in the competitive Brazilian e-commerce sector, focusing on marketplace integration services that enable sellers to unify sales channels and optimize operations. Its business model revolves around subscription plans tailored to different operation sizes, from small to large enterprises, with features like multi-CNPJ support and mass ad creation. The company leverages partnerships and certifications to strengthen its market position. The website's content and structure indicate a strong emphasis on customer education and support, including an academy and extensive blog resources. The presence of multiple integrations with major marketplaces such as Mercado Livre, Amazon, and Magalu highlights its comprehensive service offering. The company’s digital marketing strategy includes retargeting and tracking tools, enhancing lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture of the Ideris website shows a mix of strengths and critical weaknesses. While email authentication mechanisms like SPF and DMARC are properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to mitigate bot activity, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose the site to potential interception and data integrity issues. The absence of HSTS, DNSSEC, and CAA records further weakens domain and transport security. No explicit security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. These issues could undermine customer trust and compliance with data protection regulations. Immediate remediation of SSL and TLS configurations is essential to improve the security baseline.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure SSL certificates with support for TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 to secure data in transit.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain name system security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security collaboration.
  5. Develop and publicly share incident response and security policies to demonstrate commitment to security and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder, enhanced with plugins for SEO (Yoast), search (Algolia), lazy loading (A3 Lazy Load), and analytics (Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, VWO). Hosting is via Amazon AWS with CloudFront CDN for content delivery. Despite a rich technology stack and good SEO practices, the site suffers from performance issues likely related to missing SSL and disabled TLS protocols. The mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. The technical debt includes outdated or missing SSL configurations and lack of DNS security features. Modernizing the SSL/TLS setup and improving accessibility would reduce technical risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ideris.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ideris.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.