Skip to main content

Security report for ideoforce.pl

Ideo Force Sp. z o.o. · E-commerce · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ideo Force Sp. z o.o. is a Polish e-marketing and e-commerce agency specializing in comprehensive digital marketing services including SEO, SEM, performance marketing, social media management, and user experience optimization. The company serves businesses aiming to enhance their online presence and sales performance. Their market position is strong, supported by certifications such as Microsoft Advertising Partner, Google Partner, and Meta Business Partners, and a portfolio of over 1000 projects with more than 70 specialists. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern tracking and analytics tools, cookie consent management, and a professional design optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit incident response policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ideoforce.pl. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ideoforce.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
97
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the E-commerce and Technology sectors, providing digital marketing and e-commerce development services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting businesses seeking to grow online. They maintain partnerships with major advertising platforms and industry bodies, enhancing credibility and market reach. The presence of multiple office locations and a comprehensive service portfolio indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a stable client base. Their content strategy includes educational resources and case studies, supporting thought leadership and client engagement. The company’s growth potential is supported by active participation in industry events and awards.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could impact transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ideo Force Sp. z o.o.
Registration number
REGON: 142314435
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ideo Force Sp. z o.o.
Description
Ideo Force is an e-marketing and e-commerce agency providing comprehensive online brand support, including strategy development, execution, analysis, and optimization. They specialize in SEM, SEO, performance marketing, content marketing, user experience (UX), and e-mail marketing.
Key services
SEO and SEM, Performance marketing, Social media marketing, E-commerce development and support, User experience and analytics, Content marketing, Google Ads and Microsoft Ads campaigns
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), JavaScript, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Microsoft Advertising, Meta (Facebook) Ads
Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from .pl registry, likely due to privacy or registry policy
  3. Strong presence of marketing and analytics tools with cookie consent implemented
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information on site
  5. Contact information is clear with multiple office locations and phone numbers
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking technologies
  9. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for consent management, and Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing and optimization. The site is built with responsive design principles and uses SVG graphics for logos and icons, contributing to good performance and scalability. While the CMS is not explicitly identified, the structure and URLs suggest a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in loading times and accessibility. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and contact points. The site integrates multiple social media platforms and marketing channels, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ideoforce.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ideoforce.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.