Skip to main content

Is idbs.org.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Upper Ouse Water Management Board

idbs.org.uk Security Report Summary

idbs.org.uk received a security score of 55 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Upper Ouse Water Management Board's website security posture. Upper Ouse Water Management Board operates in the Government industry in United Kingdom.

The Upper Ouse Water Management Board website represents a statutory public body responsible for stormwater management and drainage services in Bedfordshire and surrounding areas. The organization is an amalgamation of three former drainage boards and provides technical guidance to local authorities and developers. The website content is professional, well-structured, and includes relevant information such as FAQs, resources, consent and planning guidance, and contact details. The site targets residents, local authorities, and developers within its drainage district. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including the ArcGIS JavaScript API for mapping, Google Fonts, and modular JavaScript. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate with good SEO and metadata implementation. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration errors, which impacts trust from a domain registration standpoint, but the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and professional representation of a government-related water management entity, with room for improvement in security posture and domain registration transparency.

The security scan identified 36 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: ArcGIS JS API 5.0, Google Fonts (Poppins), CSS3, JavaScript ES6 Modules.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

idbs.org.uk favicon

Is idbs.org.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Upper Ouse Water Management Board

https://www.idbs.org.uk/

Check if idbs.org.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Kingdomsmall
ArcGIS JS API 5.0Google Fonts (Poppins)CSS3JavaScript ES6 Modules
Analyzed Completed
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Government avg (70)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for idbs.org.uk

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

The Upper Ouse Water Management Board website represents a statutory public body responsible for stormwater management and drainage services in Bedfordshire and surrounding areas. The organization is an amalgamation of three former drainage boards and provides technical guidance to local authorities and developers. The website content is professional, well-structured, and includes relevant information such as FAQs, resources, consent and planning guidance, and contact details. The site targets residents, local authorities, and developers within its drainage district. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including the ArcGIS JavaScript API for mapping, Google Fonts, and modular JavaScript. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate with good SEO and metadata implementation. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration errors, which impacts trust from a domain registration standpoint, but the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and professional representation of a government-related water management entity, with room for improvement in security posture and domain registration transparency.

Detected Technologies

ArcGIS JS API 5.0Google Fonts (Poppins)CSS3JavaScript ES6 Modules

11 urgent findings need attention

11 high

  • + 3 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep idbs.org.uk under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for idbs.org.uk.

Security Headers

8 findings

15/100

GDPR Compliance

3 findings

68/100

NIS2 Compliance

9 findings

2/100

Email Security

4 findings

80/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Upper Ouse Water Management Board operates as a regional statutory authority in the UK government sector, focusing on water management and drainage. Its business model is service-oriented, providing maintenance, technical guidance, and regulatory compliance support. The organization benefits from a clear market position as a public body with defined geographic jurisdiction. The website indicates active communication through news updates and public resources, suggesting engagement with stakeholders. There are no indications of commercial revenue streams or partnerships beyond government and web design services. The absence of social media presence and limited digital marketing tools suggest a focus on direct community and governmental interaction rather than broad commercial outreach.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and incident response contacts limits the security maturity. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. The WHOIS data issue raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the site content and contact details mitigate this risk. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but would benefit from enhanced security policies, header implementation, and transparency around incident response.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Upper Ouse Water Management Board

Description:

The Upper Ouse Water Management Board is an amalgamated statutory body formed from the merger of three individual Boards, formerly known collectively as the Bedford Group of Drainage Boards. The Board is responsible for local stormwater management through maintenance and improvement of watercourses and adoption of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). It also provides technical expertise and guidance to local authorities and developers within the Town and Country planning process.

Key Services:
Stormwater managementWatercourse maintenance and improvementSustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) adoptionTechnical guidance for planning and development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ArcGIS JS API 5.0Google Fonts (Poppins)CSS3JavaScript ES6 Modules
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Skip links for accessibility
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the idbs.org.uk security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete idbs.org.uk security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.ignite.co.uk include:servers.tjs.co.uk include:damo.tjs.co.uk -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

27/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(206 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:45.145.103.242
Name Servers:
ns7.fast.net.ukDNS only
ns8.fast.net.ukDNS only
MX Records:
10: clustera.ignite.co.uk
20: clusterb.ignite.co.uk
SOA:Serial: 2026021300, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:50ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.ignite.co.uk include:servers.tjs.co.uk include:damo.tjs.co.uk -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does idbs.org.uk compare?

See how idbs.org.uk stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with modular JavaScript and integration of the ArcGIS API for interactive mapping. Google Fonts are loaded asynchronously for performance. The site is responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and focus management scripts. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource caching. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces complexity but also limits insights into user behavior. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for an informational government site but could be enhanced with improved security headers and performance tuning.
Professional Report

Download the idbs.org.uk report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the idbs.org.uk report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about idbs.org.uk

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website