Skip to main content

Security report for idainfront.se

Ida Infront · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ida Infront AB is a well-established Swedish company specializing in digital IT solutions primarily for the public sector across the Nordic region. Founded in 1984 and part of the Addnode Group, the company offers a suite of products under the iipax brand focusing on secure information exchange, efficient case management, and sustainable e-archiving. Their market presence includes over 40 government agencies and more than 110 municipalities, positioning them as a key player in Nordic public sector IT. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging tailored to their target audience of public sector organizations and select private companies such as insurance firms. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, optimized for SEO and mobile use, and includes a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching idainfront.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ida Infront's business model centers on providing modular, scalable IT solutions that integrate securely into public sector workflows, enabling digital transformation and compliance with evolving regulatory standards. Their competitive advantage lies in their proprietary iipax platform and deep integration with Nordic public sector needs. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, support, and consulting services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, notably with its parent Addnode Group, and leverages social media channels for brand engagement. Growth indicators include a sizable employee base (~140), multiple office locations, and a broad customer base across government and private sectors. Strategic observations suggest continued focus on innovation in secure digital communication and AI-enhanced case management.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, no visible sensitive data exposure, and a cookie consent mechanism supporting user privacy. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and AddToAny is managed responsibly, but ongoing audits are recommended. The absence of security headers in the provided data suggests an opportunity to strengthen defenses against common web threats. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to foster trust and responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ida Infront AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ida Infront
Description
Ida Infront är ett väletablerat företag som verkar inom offentlig sektor i Norden. Med produkter baserade på iipax erbjuder företaget digitala lösningar inom säkert informationsutbyte, effektiv ärendehantering och hållbar e-arkivering.
Key services
Säkert informationsutbyte, Effektiv ärendehantering, Hållbar e-arkivering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, AddToAny sharing, Responsive design, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • Google Tag Manager asynchronously loaded
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent modal with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny sharing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on public sector IT solutions in Nordic countries.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with user control.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram supports brand trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google Fonts, reflecting a modern and maintainable tech stack. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts like Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and lazy loading for images, improving load times and user experience. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for modernization. Hosting details are not explicit, but the site uses CDN services for fonts and scripts, indicating a distributed infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with idainfront.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review idainfront.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.