Skip to main content

Security report for iczgroup.cz

ICZ Group · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ICZ Group is a Czech Republic-based technology company specializing in integrated software and network solutions. The company positions itself as a partner to businesses aiming to improve operational efficiency through IT systems and services. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider with a focus on technology solutions. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Divi Builder and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site employs cookie consent mechanisms and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information on the homepage limits transparency. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and consent management in place, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response disclosures. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the website. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iczgroup.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICZ Group operates in the technology sector, providing IT systems and services primarily to business clients. Their market position appears established regionally, with a business model focused on delivering integrated software and network solutions. The company targets enterprises seeking to optimize business processes through technology. The website content and structured data confirm the company name and sector but lack detailed financial or operational data. The use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising platforms suggests active marketing efforts. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears medium-sized and founded around 2017 based on website metadata.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management with granular user controls, which are positive security indicators. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is published, limiting transparency on how security incidents are handled. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, published policies, and verified domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Add explicit security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to improve web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact details to demonstrate readiness and transparency.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ICZ Group
Description
ICZ je dodavatelem informačních technologií, systémů a služeb, ale především partnerem, který pomůže dosáhnout vyšší efektivity podnikání našich klientů.
Key services
information technology supply, systems, services, software and network integrated solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Builder, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, LinkedIn, Seznam.cz, YouTube
Marketing tools
Google AdSense, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and cookie consent mechanisms.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly linked or found.
  5. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  6. Strong use of third-party analytics and advertising services.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Divi Builder and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site uses jQuery and other standard web technologies. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. There is room for improvement in accessibility and advanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iczgroup.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iczgroup.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.