Skip to main content

Security report for ictrainer.de

icTrainer · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

icTrainer is a small German company specializing in affordable indoor cycling software tailored for cyclists and triathletes. Their product complements roller and spinning bikes, targeting a niche market of fitness enthusiasts focused on indoor training. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern SEO and cookie consent tools, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure leverages popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive GDPR-aligned policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ictrainer.de

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ictrainer.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ictrainer.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the sports and fitness software niche, focusing on indoor cycling solutions. Their business model revolves around software sales and possibly subscription or license-based offerings. The target audience includes cyclists and triathletes seeking affordable indoor training tools. The website's integration with multiple analytics and marketing platforms suggests active customer engagement and growth efforts. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube supports community building and brand awareness. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent small business. The company is based in Germany, aligning with the website's language and contact information. The business appears stable with consistent branding and clear market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam on contact forms. Cookie consent is managed via a professional plugin ensuring GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response plan limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider periodic security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Indoor Training UG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
icTrainer
Description
icTrainer. Die günstige Indoor Cycling Software für Radfahrer und Triathleten. Die perfekte Ergänzung zu Rollen- und Spinningbikes.
Key services
Indoor Cycling Software, Software für Rollen- und Spinningbikes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Fonts, YouTube embeds, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management with Real Cookie Banner Pro
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Real Cookie Banner Pro
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and cookie consent plugins.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  3. Multiple external services from Google and Microsoft used for analytics and marketing.
  4. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. Contact information includes email and physical address in Germany.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is professional and targeted to athletes.
  7. Good mobile optimization and SEO practices observed.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Astra theme and uses Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization. It employs Real Cookie Banner Pro for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by rzone.de as indicated by the nameservers. The site integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics (GA4), Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, YouTube embeds, Microsoft Clarity for session recording, and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection. Performance is moderate with preloading and caching mechanisms in place. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical setup is modern and suitable for a small business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ictrainer.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ictrainer.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.