Skip to main content

Security report for icpsmorocco.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.icpsmorocco.org is a Japanese-language skincare affiliate marketing site focused on pore and blackhead care. It provides detailed content on skincare routines and ranks popular products with affiliate links. The site targets Japanese consumers interested in beauty and skincare products. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with some tracking scripts for analytics but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. Security posture is minimal with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or privacy policies present. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces trustworthiness and transparency. Overall, the site functions as an affiliate marketing platform with moderate content quality but limited business credibility and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icpsmorocco.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in the niche skincare affiliate marketing sector, focusing on Japanese consumers. It leverages product reviews and rankings to generate affiliate revenue. The lack of clear business identity, contact information, and privacy policies suggests a low level of corporate transparency. The external links indicate partnerships with affiliate networks such as A8.net and AFI-B. The business model relies on content marketing and affiliate commissions rather than direct product sales. Growth potential depends on SEO and content relevance in the competitive Japanese skincare market.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. While HTTPS is implemented, the site lacks essential security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site collects user data via tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms, posing GDPR compliance risks. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. There is a need for improved security controls, privacy policies, and transparency to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including a dedicated security contact or incident response channel.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Obtain and publish transparent WHOIS and business registration information to increase legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and product recommendations related to skincare, specifically focusing on pore and blackhead care. It offers advice on skincare routines, product rankings, and detailed descriptions of popular skincare products.
Key services
Skincare advice, Product rankings and reviews, Affiliate links to skincare products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
A8.net, AFI-B
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. Content is in Japanese and focused on skincare, specifically pore and blackhead care.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. Site uses affiliate marketing links extensively.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is used but no advanced security configurations.
  7. No CMS or hosting provider information detected.
  8. Multiple external domains linked, mostly affiliate and related skincare sites.
  9. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro present for analytics.
  10. No social media links or company branding beyond product affiliate content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance is moderate with some external tracking scripts that may impact load times. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks structured data beyond a simple breadcrumb JSON-LD. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal but functional. The site uses affiliate marketing networks for monetization. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icpsmorocco.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icpsmorocco.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.