Skip to main content

Security report for icor.info

International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations (ICOR) operates a multilingual website serving as a platform for revolutionary political parties and organizations worldwide. The site provides news, resolutions, conference information, and contributions from member organizations, positioning itself as a niche international political coordination network. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on information dissemination and coordination among leftist groups. Technically, the website is built on the Plone CMS with a React frontend, incorporating Matomo analytics for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Security posture is generally sound with HTTPS enforced, but the lack of security headers and incident response information reduces the overall security maturity. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to unsupported TLD WHOIS queries, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No signs of malicious activity or vulnerabilities were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, the website is functional, professionally designed, and serves its target audience effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icor.info

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICOR occupies a specialized niche in the political coordination sector, targeting revolutionary parties and activists internationally. Its competitive advantage lies in multilingual content and a centralized platform for resolutions and conferences. The business model is informational and non-commercial, relying on organizational contributions rather than revenue streams. The partnership with the International Anti-Imperialist Anti-Fascist United Front indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited but consistent with a focused political network. The absence of commercial contact details suggests a low-profile operational approach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability management. The use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking but lacks explicit cookie consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header implementation and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for users with disabilities.
  5. Increase domain registration transparency by using a registrar that supports public WHOIS data or providing organizational details on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations
Description
International coordination platform for revolutionary parties and organizations with news, resolutions, conferences, and contributions.
Key services
Publishing resolutions, Hosting conference information, Sharing political articles and contributions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Plone CMS, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Plone CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is focused on international revolutionary political coordination.
  3. Multiple languages supported indicating international audience.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  6. Uses Plone CMS with React frontend and Matomo analytics.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to unsupported TLD in WHOIS service.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack combining Plone CMS with a React frontend, enabling dynamic content delivery and multilingual support. Matomo analytics is used for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile responsiveness but basic SEO and accessibility features. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the infrastructure is stable but could be modernized with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icor.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icor.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.