Skip to main content

Security report for ico.org.uk

Information Commissioner's Office · Government · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is the UK's independent regulator responsible for upholding information rights and data protection laws. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for individuals, public bodies, and organizations, providing guidance, complaint mechanisms, and enforcement information. The ICO holds a strong market position as the national data protection authority with a clear mission to empower citizens and organizations through information rights. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS (Umbraco), employs responsive design, and integrates cookie consent and analytics tools responsibly. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly detailed. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with GDPR and UK data protection standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ico.org.uk

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
50
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The ICO operates as a government regulatory body with a large organizational size and a focus on data protection, freedom of information, and privacy rights. Its business model is regulatory and advisory, targeting both the public and organizations across sectors. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation and authoritative content. The ICO maintains active social media channels to engage with stakeholders. There is no evidence of commercial advertising or affiliate partnerships, consistent with its public service mandate. The domain age and registration details align with the organization's history, reinforcing legitimacy and trust.

Security posture

The ICO website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure information represents a gap in transparency and readiness communication. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in defense-in-depth. The use of third-party analytics is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy best practices. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing dedicated security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and stakeholder trust.
  2. Implement and document a vulnerability disclosure program including a security.txt file.
  3. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ico.org.uk or abuse@ico.org.uk).
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Information Commissioner's Office
Description
The ICO is the UK's independent authority set up to uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting openness by public bodies and data privacy for individuals.
Key services
Data protection guidance, Freedom of information enforcement, Complaints handling, Data breach reporting, Public awareness and education
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Civic Cookie Control
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Silktide
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Silktide
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on data protection, privacy, and public information.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy notices implemented.
  4. No direct email or phone contacts found on homepage; contact via dedicated contact page.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on main site.
  6. Social media presence on major platforms (X, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook).
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Use of third-party analytics (Silktide) with user consent.
  9. Modern, responsive design with accessibility considerations.
Technical notes

Notes

The ICO website is built on a modern CMS platform (Umbraco) with clean HTML5 and CSS3 markup. It uses JavaScript for interactive elements and integrates a reputable cookie consent tool (Civic Cookie Control). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles. Performance appears fast with minimal external dependencies. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, though some meta descriptions are empty. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is reputable. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities to enhance security headers and incident response visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ico.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ico.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.