Skip to main content

Security report for icegaytube.tv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IceGayTube.tv is an adult entertainment website specializing in free gay pornographic videos, offering a wide range of content including homemade clips and professionally produced movies. The platform supports multiple languages and provides features such as video uploads and playlist management, targeting an adult audience interested in gay adult content. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and Google Analytics for tracking, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks advanced security disclosures and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant transparency reduces trustworthiness, common in adult content sites but impacting business credibility. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and a simple cookie policy page, but no clear GDPR compliance or detailed privacy policy is evident.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icegaytube.tv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche adult entertainment sector, focusing on free streaming of gay porn videos. Its business model appears to rely on advertising revenue and user-generated content uploads. The site maintains a moderate market position within its niche, supported by multi-language capabilities and a structured content categorization system. Partnerships with ad networks such as hprofits.com and wolf-327b.com indicate monetization strategies through advertising. The lack of explicit business contact information and WHOIS transparency suggests a small-scale operation with limited public corporate presence. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not clearly visible, but the site maintains consistent content updates and user engagement features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers implemented. However, the lack of visible CSRF protections on forms and absence of CAPTCHA on upload forms present potential abuse risks. No published security policies or incident response contacts are found, indicating limited formal security governance. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML, which is positive, but the overall security maturity is basic. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a cookie consent banner and a basic cookie policy page. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces trust and transparency, which is a security concern from a business legitimacy perspective.

Recommendations

  1. Implement CSRF tokens and validation on all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  2. Add CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation mechanisms on upload and interactive forms to reduce spam and abuse.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies including GDPR compliance details to improve transparency.
  4. Establish and publicize incident response and abuse contact channels to enhance security readiness.
  5. Improve business credibility by providing verifiable contact information and WHOIS transparency where possible.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Dive into the world of best gay porn movies and watch homemade male sex clips along with latino and black big cock men hardcore videos.
Key services
free gay porn video streaming, video upload, playlist management, multi-language support
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Select2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
hprofits.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult entertainment platform focused on free gay porn videos.
  2. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is completely unavailable, indicating privacy protection or lack of transparency.
  4. No explicit contact or business information found on the site.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present, but privacy policy is basic and lacks GDPR compliance indicators.
  6. Site uses HTTPS and standard security headers but lacks advanced security disclosures.
  7. Advertising and tracking are present via Google Analytics and third-party ad networks.
  8. Site supports multiple languages and has a structured navigation system.
  9. No social media or company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, leveraging libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Select2 for enhanced form controls. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloading of critical assets for performance. SEO is supported with meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icegaytube.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icegaytube.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.