Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) · Government · United States
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.
The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is an official U.S. government website operated by the FBI, serving as the central hub for reporting cyber-enabled crimes. It provides a secure platform for the public and industry to file complaints, access alerts, and obtain resources related to cybercrime. The website is well-branded with consistent FBI and government identity elements, reinforcing its authority and trustworthiness. The target audience includes victims of cybercrime, law enforcement, and private sector partners. Technically, the site employs modern web standards and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) framework, ensuring accessibility, mobile responsiveness, and a professional user experience. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced, SSL encryption on forms, and content security policies implemented. However, the site lacks an explicit cookie consent mechanism and a dedicated security policy page, which are areas for improvement. From a security posture perspective, the site demonstrates strong practices with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to .gov domain privacy restrictions, which is typical and justified for government domains. The domain expiry date aligns with official management, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site scores highly on trust, security, and content quality, making it a reliable resource for cybercrime reporting. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance, publishing a clear security policy or incident response page, and adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust. These steps will further strengthen the site's compliance and security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention ic3.gov, from OffSeq Breach.
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ic3.gov.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ic3.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ic3.gov.