Skip to main content

Security report for iboe.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at iboe.com appears to be related to movies or media content, as indicated by the page title 'Comscore Movies'. The domain is well-established, created in 2003, and registered through a reputable registrar, MarkMonitor Inc., with standard domain protections. The technical infrastructure includes Bootstrap 4.6.2 for frontend styling and Amazon AWS for DNS hosting, indicating a modern but basic technical setup. However, the website content is minimal and lacks critical business and compliance information such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, terms of service, and contact details. Security posture is weak with no detected security headers or advanced configurations, and no DNSSEC enabled. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks transparency and compliance features, which impacts trust and credibility.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iboe.com

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
87
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iboe.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
195
Employees
0
Customers
195
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
17%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for iboe.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind iboe.com is not clearly identified on the website. There is no visible company name, contact information, or business description. The domain's longevity suggests an established presence, but the lack of business details and policies limits insights into market positioning or business model. The site targets a general audience interested in movies or media, but the absence of marketing or analytics tools suggests limited digital marketing efforts. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the content.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is presumably enabled (implied by domain and hosting), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts were identified, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and enable HSTS.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding analytics and marketing tools with proper user consent mechanisms to enhance business intelligence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Bootstrap 4.6.2, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website appears to be a movie-related service or product with minimal content visible.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information or business details are provided on the accessible content.
  4. Technical stack includes Bootstrap 4.6.2 and AWS DNS hosting.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly identified.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.6.2, a widely adopted CSS framework, indicating a standard responsive design approach. Hosting DNS is managed via Amazon AWS, a reliable provider. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles, suggesting a modular frontend architecture. However, the content is minimal and lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata beyond the title. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading, but no advanced optimization or accessibility features are evident. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no visible sitemap or robots directives.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iboe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iboe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.